Village · 3,089 residents
Good · better than 6 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Marlow Bottom scores 66/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (93).
It scores lowest on food & drink (22) and health (30).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Marlow Bottom in South East, each measured against the national average.
Detached houses on generous plots, cars on the drive rather than the street, hedges doing the job that fences would do elsewhere — Marlow Bottom reads as a place people move to once they've decided what they want, rather than somewhere anyone passes through. There's no high street to speak of, and that's the point rather than an oversight.
The numbers back up what you'd guess from the streetscape: this is among the least deprived pockets of the country, sitting at the very top decile for both income and general deprivation measures, and a median age of 49 tells you it's well past the young-professional-flatshare stage of life. Housing here is almost uniformly detached and freehold — of the recent sales sampled, the overwhelming majority were detached houses, all freehold, with a median price around £765,000, comfortably above both the Buckinghamshire figure and more than double the national median. A "For Sale" board on this street is not an entry-level purchase; it's a signal that whoever's selling bought in years ago or has already traded up once. Schooling is thin on the ground within the village itself — only one school appears locally — so families here tend to look outward to Marlow proper or beyond for options, which is worth knowing before you assume the village will meet every need on its own doorstep.
Green space is modest in raw terms, a couple of named plots totalling under two hectares, which is low against the regional average per head — this is a place for garden living and short walks rather than sprawling parkland, and anyone wanting big open country rambles will be driving to it rather than stepping into it. Full-fibre broadband reaches a solid majority of properties, which matters more than it used to now that plenty of residents seem to be working from those detached houses rather than commuting daily. Safety is the standout figure: crime sits low in absolute terms, with the annual count dominated by violence and sexual offences as a share rather than volume, and the area reads as safer than the wider Buckinghamshire average on the rate comparison. It's a flat trend, not a dramatic improvement — this has evidently been a quiet place for a while, not one that's recently cleaned up its act.
This suits people who've already done the commuting years elsewhere and want space, quiet and a garden more than they want amenities on the doorstep — older buyers, established families, anyone who values low crime and detached privacy over walkable convenience. It won't suit someone wanting a lively local high street, a wide school choice within the village, or an affordable first step onto the property ladder.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.