Village · 475 residents
Good · better than 8 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Manuden scores 69/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (82) and environment (76).
It scores lowest on health (38).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Manuden in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Manuden looks like what it is: a scattering of period cottages and a handful of detached houses around a village core, the kind of place where the traffic noise is mostly tractors and the school run. There's no high street bustle to speak of — this is a village of 29 people in the immediate footprint the data covers, which tells you straight away that whatever happens here happens quietly.
The numbers back up that quiet. Overall this is graded among the stronger areas nationally, with safety and the environment both rated well above the national average — and the single crime record on file, in a place this size, isn't a pattern so much as a rounding error. Schools sit at a solid, unspectacular level: Manuden Primary School is rated Good, a fair reflection of what you'd expect from a well-off Essex-border village rather than a place chasing Outstanding badges. Housing is where the character sharpens: this is Freehold, detached-house territory almost by default, with a median sale price of £855,000 against a national figure well under half that — Uttlesford as a whole already runs pricier than the country, and Manuden sits comfortably above even that, at odds with a council tax band that's actually below the national median. That combination — big freehold houses, modest banding — is the quiet oddity in an otherwise coherent picture of comfortable, older-skewing rural England; the median age here is pushing 48, a decade above the national figure, which tells you this is not a village full of first-time buyers.
Day to day, you're working with seven green spaces across a modest spread of hectares — enough for a proper dog walk without ever feeling manicured — and a transport offer that's more about road and bus stops than rail; the connectivity grade is strong, but this reads as a driving village, not a platform-and-season-ticket one. Full-fibre broadband reaches two-thirds of properties, which matters more than it used to now that a fair few residents likely work from home some of the week. Health provision is graded respectably rather than exceptionally, which is the honest state of rural GP access most places share.
Who fits here is fairly obvious from the shape of the data: households with the equity for a detached freehold, in no rush to commute daily by rail, happy with a Good primary school rather than needing an Outstanding one, and drawn to low crime and open ground over convenience shopping. It's a harder sell if you need frequent trains or want a bustling social scene on your doorstep — there's very little here to suggest either. The regret risk isn't safety or schools; it's isolation, both social and logistical, if you arrive expecting village life to come with amenities it simply doesn't carry.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.