Village · 1,291 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Lower Quinton scores 73/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (74) and health (72).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Lower Quinton in West Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Stone cottages, farmhouses converted into family homes, cars parked half on verges because the lanes were never built for two-way traffic — this is the kind of village where the streetscape tells you immediately you've left the commuter belt proper and landed somewhere quieter. Lower Quinton doesn't perform for visitors; it's the sort of place people move to and then rarely explain why, because the answer is just "it's calm here."
The practical picture is straightforward rather than glamorous. There's no rail station in the village itself, so this only works if you're comfortable driving to catch trains elsewhere, or if you've arranged work around not commuting daily at all — the median age of late thirties suggests a fair few residents have already made that trade-off. On schooling, Quinton Primary School serves the village directly, and Tudor Grange Primary Academy Meon Vale, rated Good, sits close enough to be a genuine alternative for families cross-shopping options. Housing here leans heavily toward semi-detached homes on freehold titles — the classic village-sale board reading, not flats, not new-build estates. At a median of £303,000, it undercuts the wider Stratford-on-Avon district by some way, and detached homes in particular sell for noticeably less locally than the national detached average, which tells you this is not a village trading on postcode prestige.
Green space is genuinine but modest — eight pieces of it across the village, all fairly small — so weekends here are shaped more by walking the lanes and gardens than by a big destination park. There's no restaurant scene to speak of in the data, which fits a population of under 150; a Saturday probably means driving into Stratford or a neighbouring village for anything beyond the essentials, not stepping out your front door to browse a high street. What stands out instead is the safety picture, and it's worth sitting with for a second: the overall grade here is A, safety itself grades A, health grades A+, schools grade A — a strong, consistent constellation. Against that backdrop the raw crime count looks alarming at first glance, with violence and sexual offences and anti-social behaviour making up the bulk of it. But the underlying total is small, the trend is flat rather than worsening, and in a village of this size a handful of incidents can dominate the percentage breakdown without reflecting daily reality on the ground.
This suits people who've already decided they want rural quiet over urban convenience — good broadband (four-fifths of properties on full fibre) means remote work is genuinely viable, which matters more here than proximity to a station. It's a place for those content with a single village school, a short list of green spaces rather than a sprawling park, and a drive rather than a walk to restaurants and shops. If you need nightlife, a rail platform, or breadth of school choice on your doorstep, you'll find the village quietly resistant to all three — and that absence is the honest trade-off, not a flaw to be talked around.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.