Suburb · 1,648 residents
Good · better than 7 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Low Team scores 65/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for property market (74) and affordability (73).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Low Team in North East, each measured against the national average.
Terraced streets dominate here, tight rows of two-up-two-downs with the odd flat conversion, and the whole place reads as a settled, working inner-Gateshead suburb rather than anywhere styled for passers-through. The population density is well above the national average, and it feels it: this is a place of close streets and shared walls, not gardens and gaps.
Housing tells the clearest story. Terraces make up the bulk of sales, leasehold outnumbers freehold by roughly four to one, and the median sale price sits at a fraction of both the regional and national medians. A "for sale" board on one of these streets is advertising a starter or a landlord purchase far more often than a forever-family home — new-build stock is essentially absent, and flats here sell for close to half the national flat price, which tells you this is a market shaped by yield and affordability, not aspiration. Set against Gateshead as a whole, prices track close to the borough norm, so you're not paying a premium or getting a bargain relative to your own council area — you're simply in one of the more affordable corners of the country, full stop.
That affordability grade sits oddly next to the crime picture, and it's worth sitting with. Overall safety is graded respectably, and the trend is described as improving, but the underlying rate runs nearly five times the Gateshead average, with violence and anti-social behaviour together accounting for half of all recorded incidents. That's the quiet spine of this place: a B+ safety grade earned via a positive direction of travel, not a low starting point. It's not a dangerous outlier for its own borough context reversed — it's a higher-crime pocket that's getting better, and the two things can both be true.
Green space is present but modest — three plots totalling seventeen hectares, enough for a local outdoor circuit rather than sprawling parkland. Full-fibre coverage sits at a solid seven in ten, so working from home is realistic even if the streets themselves are compact. Health provision scores only fair, and with median age at 36 — younger than both the regional and national norm — this reads as a working-age population rather than one settled into retirement, likely a mix of renters and first-time buyers drawn by the price point and the transport links, with the connectivity and transport grades both coming in comfortably above the health and schools grades. It suits someone who wants a cheap foothold near Gateshead's centre and is prepared to accept a rougher crime profile than the borough average in exchange for it — and it asks that you're comfortable watching a place improve rather than arriving somewhere already settled.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.