Village · 203 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Civil parish boundary
Longstowe scores 52/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (82).
It scores lowest on transport (31) and food & drink (39).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Longstowe in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Longstowe is the kind of place where the houses do the talking: detached brick and render set well back from the road, freehold signs rather than "share of," and barely two hundred and forty people spread thinly enough that you notice a parked van. There's no high street to speak of, no strip of shopfronts pulling in passers-by — this is a village that keeps to itself, and the people who end up here tend to have chosen it deliberately rather than landed on it by chance.
The numbers back up that impression of a settled, moneyed pocket rather than a commuter dormitory. A median age of 48 tells you this isn't a place full of young families chasing their first step up the ladder; it's populated by people further along. Housing here runs heavily detached and entirely freehold, and with a median sale price around £529,000 against a national figure closer to £281,000, you're looking at a village sitting comfortably above both the regional and national norm — about 27% pricier than the South Cambridgeshire average it sits within, which is itself no bargain corner of the country. The rub is transport: a C-grade on connectivity suggests you'll be relying on a car for anything beyond the village boundary, so if your work depends on a fast rail link into Cambridge or London, Longstowe asks you to plan around that rather than assume it.
Green space is modest rather than abundant — three pockets amounting to under three hectares, which reads as pleasant paddocks and verges rather than anywhere you'd plan a whole day out. There's little sense of a restaurant scene or a night out on your doorstep; this is a place for gardens, dog walks, and driving somewhere else for dinner. Safety is the standout in the data: an A-grade against a background of only ten recorded crimes in the past year, and even within that small number, the mix skews toward the kind of low-level anti-social behaviour and vehicle incidents you'd find anywhere, not a pattern that should worry you. Schools carry a solid B+, suggesting reasonable options without a marquee name pulling families in from elsewhere. Broadband is a mixed bag — just over half the village has full-fibre coverage, which is fine for most households but worth checking on your specific street before assuming a seamless work-from-home setup.
Put together, this is a village for people who've already worked out that they want quiet, space, and a bit of insulation from the noise of urban life, and who are prepared to trade convenience — decent internet aside — for that. It rewards patience and a car in the driveway rather than an Oyster card in the pocket. If your daily rhythm depends on transport links or a lively social scene close to home, you'll likely find it thin; if what you want is a settled, low-crime, well-off corner of Cambridgeshire to retreat into, it delivers exactly that.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.