Village · 846 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Lingdale scores 46/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (85) and affordability (75).
It scores lowest on infrastructure (27).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Lingdale in North East, each measured against the national average.
Terraced streets, pebble-dashed semis, and a high street that doesn't try to be anything other than what it is — Lingdale reads as an old mining village that's settled into quiet middle age. The houses are modest, the pace is slower than the coast roads nearby, and the people you see out and about skew older than you'd find in most English villages.
The numbers back up that impression: a median age around 51 against a national figure closer to 40, so this is a place of established households rather than young families arriving in a hurry. Schooling is limited to one option in the data — Lingdale Primary School, an academy converter currently rated as requiring improvement, which is worth sitting with if you have young children rather than glossing over. There's no rail station in the picture here, and connectivity is graded only a C, so this reads as a village for people who drive rather than commute by train. Housing is about as affordable as it gets: the median sale price sits at £119,000, some 23% below the wider Redcar and Cleveland average, and the terraced Freehold stock that dominates sales here means a For Sale board is likely advertising a straightforward, no-chain, easy-to-maintain house rather than a project.
Green space is genuinely part of the fabric — seven separate plots across the village, modest in size individually, giving you somewhere to walk the dog without needing to drive anywhere first. There's no named restaurant or pub in the data to point you toward, which fits a village this size: life here is domestic and low-key rather than built around a night out. Health is graded strongly (an A), and the overall picture — affordability, environment, transport for drivers — comes through as a genuinely well-scoring village on paper. The one place this softens is safety: graded B, sitting in the bottom decile nationally for deprivation, and with a crime rate that the data flags as vastly higher than the surrounding unitary authority's average, driven mostly by violence and anti-social behaviour categories rather than burglary or theft. It's worth being clear-eyed about that gap between the reassuring letter grades elsewhere and this one weaker patch — the safety trend itself is reported as flat, so it isn't a place actively getting worse, but the underlying numbers are not as comfortable as the general tone of the area suggests.
Put together, this suits people who want a cheap, solid freehold house, don't need a fast train commute, and are comfortable with an older, settled community rather than a buzzing one. If you're moving here with young children, the single local school's current Ofsted rating is the detail to look at hardest before committing, and it's worth reading the crime figures alongside the rest rather than letting the generally strong grades wave it past you.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.