Village · 921 residents
Good · better than 2 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Kingsley scores 57/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (80) and environment (73).
It scores lowest on infrastructure (35) and food & drink (38).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Kingsley in West Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Kingsley sits well off any main road rhythm — stone and brick cottages, farmhouses, a scatter of detached homes, and not much passing traffic. It's the kind of place where you notice a car because it's unusual, not because there's a jam. With a population barely into the sixties and density a fraction of the regional average, this reads as proper countryside rather than commuter overspill, and the age profile — pushing 49 versus a national median of 40 — tells you most of your neighbours have been here a while rather than just arrived.
The practical picture is straightforward if a little sparse. St Werburgh's CE Primary, rated Good, covers the immediate schooling need, though it's the only school the village itself offers, so secondary years mean travelling out. There's no rail station attached to Kingsley, and the connectivity grade — a C, out of step with the A-grade safety and environment scores around it — is the honest tell here: broadband is decent (nearly two-thirds full fibre) but you're relying on the car and a handful of bus stops to get anywhere with a shop bigger than a village store. On the housing side, this is freehold territory through and through — every sale in the local sample was freehold, mostly semi-detached and detached family homes, which is what a "for sale" board here actually means: a proper house with a garden, not a flat share. Prices sit a little above the wider Staffordshire Moorlands district, and comfortably below the national average, which is part of why the affordability grade comes out as an A even as the housing grade itself is a still-solid B.
Green space is generous relative to the size of the place — five plots across the village, modest in hectares but proportionally large for so few residents — and this is a place for walking dogs and stopping to talk over a gate rather than a night-out destination; there's no meaningful nightlife or restaurant scene to speak of in the data, and that fits the picture of a village built around quiet rather than options. Crime is worth naming plainly because the raw count looks alarming until you see the shape: three incidents in the past twelve months is a tiny number in absolute terms, even though violence and sexual offences make up the largest share of the historical breakdown — in a population this small, a handful of incidents will always dominate the percentages without meaning the place feels unsafe day to day. The A-grade for safety reflects that reality better than the category breakdown does.
This suits someone who wants a settled, older-skewing rural community, is comfortable driving for schools, shops and a night out, and values a freehold house with land over convenience. It won't suit anyone who needs a station on the doorstep or wants neighbours their own age in bulk — the trade-off here is quiet and space against everyday convenience, and Kingsley comes down decisively on the side of quiet.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.