Suburb · 13,599 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Kings Hedges scores 48/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
No topic reaches "very good" (70+); its best is infrastructure (67).
It scores lowest on food & drink (24) and transport (31).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Kings Hedges in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Kings Hedges reads as a working estate turned settled suburb: rows of 1960s and 70s terraces and semis, low-rise and dense, with the kind of street pattern where everyone's a few doors from a cut-through to a green strip. It's a part of Cambridge that doesn't trade on postcard looks, and doesn't pretend to.
The housing picture tells you most of what you need to know before you even view anything. Terraces dominate the sales here, most of it freehold, and at a median of £390,000 it sits noticeably below Cambridge as a whole — around 17% cheaper than the city's typical price, which for a university town is a real gap rather than noise. A For Sale board on one of these streets is most likely advertising a freehold terrace in the high £300s, not a leasehold flat, though flats (priced closer to the national average than anything else here) are the entry point if that budget's still a stretch. Schools are a genuine strength: The Grove Primary School holds a Good rating, and the area's overall schools grade is comfortably above the national pattern even though North Cambridge Academy's Progress 8 score (0.19) is only modest. Commuting is more mixed — the transport grade sits mid-table, so this reads as a suburb for people who drive or cycle into the city centre rather than one built around a station.
Green space is genuinely abundant for the population packed into it — 33 separate plots across the area, which is a lot of small parks and verges rather than one big destination, fitting a weekend pattern of local walks and the school run rather than a big day out. That domestic, unglamorous rhythm is echoed in the nightlife grade, which is the one letter that breaks from everything else — a D+ against B-range marks for environment, safety, connectivity and schools. It's the quiet tell here: this is not a place that goes out, whatever else it does well. Healthcare access similarly only rates a C, worth knowing if that matters to you. Crime is dominated by violence and sexual offences, which make up over a third of all incidents, with anti-social behaviour a clear second — in line with the "B" safety grade and a flat five-year trend, so nothing sliding in either direction, just a steady baseline to weigh rather than a red flag.
Altogether this is a suburb for people who've already decided Cambridge is where they want to be but can't or won't pay the central or south-city premium — median age in the mid-30s, income sitting toward the lower end nationally (decile 2) even though the area itself isn't especially deprived by the wider deprivation measure (decile 5). You get solid primary schooling, cheaper freehold housing than the city average, and a lot of modest green space on your doorstep; you give up a lively evening scene and easy rail access. Whether that trade reads as a bargain or a compromise depends entirely on what you were expecting Cambridge to feel like.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.