Town · 139,641 residents
Good · better than 5 in 10 towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Council boundary
Ipswich scores 67/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (76).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Ipswich in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Ipswich reads as a working county town rather than a commuter dormitory: terraces and semis line most streets, the odd Victorian villa near the centre, and a housing stock that's clearly built for people who work locally rather than people who disappear to London five days a week. The population density here is well above both the regional and national average, so it feels more packed-in than the East of England's reputation for market towns and coastline might suggest — this is a proper urban centre, not a village with a station.
The practical picture is mixed in an honest way. House prices sit at a median of £230,000, barely above the parent district figure and well under the national £281,000 — this is a place where a semi-detached home (the most common sale, mostly freehold) is within reach in a way it simply isn't in much of the South East. Flats undersell the national comparison by nearly half, which tells you the flat market here is thin and cheap rather than aspirational. Schools are a genuinely mixed bag: the average Ofsted rating sits right at the national norm, and progress 8 scores run slightly negative, but St Mary's Catholic Primary carries an Outstanding rating and Derby Road gives you a second rail option alongside the main station — useful if you need flexibility rather than a single commuter artery. Rents undercut the national median by a noticeable margin too, which matters if you're renting rather than buying.
Green space is where Ipswich quietly outperforms — 271 green spaces across the town add up to serious acreage, and the overall environment grade sits at the top of the pattern here, well above the more middling marks for nightlife and schools. That's the shape of the place: an area that scores strongly on space and connectivity (full-fibre broadband covers nearly all of the town, which is rare) but only average on the things people search hardest for, like schooling. Safety needs a level head applied to it: violent and sexual offences make up over 40% of recorded crime, well ahead of shoplifting and criminal damage behind it, yet the town's own trend is marked as improving and the safety grade lands solidly mid-table rather than as an outlier. It's not a soft picture, but it isn't worsening either.
Income here sits low nationally — decile 2 — even though the broader deprivation measure is more middling at decile 5, a gap that says something real: wages haven't kept pace with the town's other advantages. That combination — affordable housing, strong connectivity, generous green space, average schools, a crime mix worth taking seriously — tends to suit people who value space and a shorter commute to work over prestige schooling or a lively evening scene, and who've made peace with the idea that a Victorian terrace in Suffolk buys you a very different life to the same money in the Home Counties.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.