Village · 942 residents
Good · better than 4 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Ifold scores 61/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (79) and transport (73).
It scores lowest on health (38).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Ifold in South East, each measured against the national average.
Ifold reads as detached houses behind hedges and long drives, the kind of place where you notice the quiet before you notice anything else. Ninety-odd residents, a population density a fraction of the national average, and a median age pushing 52 tell you this isn't a village geared around young families arriving in a hurry — it's settled, established, and largely built around people who've been here a while or bought in deliberately for the space.
The housing picture backs that up without needing much interpretation: sales here are almost entirely detached homes, bought freehold, with a median price north of £760,000 — more than double the national figure and comfortably above even the regional norm. Against Chichester, the district it sits within, Ifold runs about 84% higher on price, which places it near the top of the market nationally (the data puts it around the 95th percentile). A "For Sale" board on this street is not inviting negotiation on a starter home; it's signalling a long-term, cash-secure purchase. Schooling nearby leans solid rather than spectacular — Loxwood Primary carries a Good rating — and with income and deprivation deciles both sitting high (9 and 8 respectively), this is a place that sits comfortably among the better-off pockets of the South East without being flashy about it.
Day-to-day life here is unhurried by design. Green space is plentiful relative to the population, and with only six transport stops logged and no rail station named in the immediate picture, this isn't a village built for the commuter dash — it suits someone who has already arranged their life around driving, working from home, or simply not needing to be anywhere at 8am. Full-fibre broadband reaches about two-thirds of properties, which matters more here than a corner shop count ever could. Crime is genuinely low in absolute terms — just two incidents recorded in the past 12 months in the immediate area — though the wider breakdown shows anti-social behaviour and violence-and-sexual-offence categories as the largest shares of what does occur locally, worth knowing even if the raw numbers stay small.
The grade pattern is consistent rather than dramatic: safety, health, schools and nightlife all sit above the national average, transport scores highest of all despite the thin stop count — likely reflecting road connectivity rather than rail — and nothing drops out of step. This suits people who've already made their money or are close to it, who want land, quiet, and distance from density, and who aren't relying on a station platform to get to work. It would suit someone chasing a fast-paced, walkable, amenity-dense life far less — there isn't one on offer here, and that's clearly the point.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.