Village · 5,364 residents
Good · better than 2 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Huthwaite scores 57/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (87) and affordability (74).
It scores lowest on food & drink (28) and health (34).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Huthwaite in East Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Terraced rows dominate Huthwaite's streets, brick-fronted and modest, with the kind of housing stock that tells you this is a former colliery village rather than a commuter dormitory dressed up as one. It sits within Bolsover district, and the visible economy — the size of the houses, the shopfronts, the pace — matches that: this is a place built around work that has largely moved on, not around people who work in Nottingham or Sheffield and sleep here.
The numbers behind that impression are straightforward. Huthwaite's median house price sits at £180,000, a touch below what you'd pay elsewhere in Bolsover and well under the national median of £281,000 — terraces here change hands around £122,500 against a national terrace price nearly double that. Every sale in the local sample was freehold, so a "For Sale" board here means exactly what it says: you're buying the whole thing outright, no ground rent, no leasehold small print, which suits the terraced-and-semi character of the streets. Two primary schools serve the village — Huthwaite All Saints Church of England Infant and Nursery School and Woodland View Primary and Nursery School — both academy converters, both without a published Ofsted rating in this data, so you'd want to visit rather than rely on a headline grade. With 41 transport stops but no rail station listed, this reads as a bus-and-car village; the median age of 39 suggests settled families and older residents rather than young professionals chasing a fast commute.
Green space is genuinely well provided for relative to the population — twenty separate plots across 11.37 hectares, in line with the national average per head, so there's room to walk a dog or let kids out even though no single park stands out as the destination. What's more telling is the pattern across the wider "grade" picture: affordability comes out top of the class, transport scores strongly too, and safety, health, housing and environment all cluster in solidly-above-average territory. Schools lag a little behind that pack, sitting just above the middle rather than shining — worth knowing if education quality is your priority, since it's the one area that doesn't match the otherwise consistent picture. Crime is dominated by violence and sexual offences, which account for over four in ten recorded incidents, well ahead of anti-social behaviour and criminal damage — a category worth understanding locally rather than skating past, though the direction of travel here is improving rather than worsening, which matters more than the single-year total.
Taken together, this is a village for people who want a house they own outright without stretching, who don't need a park with a name to make Saturday feel worthwhile, and who are prepared to drive or bus rather than rail into bigger towns. Income levels here sit toward the lower end nationally, and the housing market has been flat rather than rising, so this isn't a place to buy on the promise of change — it's a place to buy because the price matches what's actually here now. Anyone weighing it up should sit with the crime mix and the unrated schools rather than the headline safety grade, then decide if the trade-off against the affordability holds up for their own life.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.