Neighbourhood · 16,079 residents
Good · better than 3 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — electoral ward boundary, used as the nearest surveyed shape
Hounslow Heath scores 56/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for schools (72).
It scores lowest on affordability (32).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Hounslow Heath in London, each measured against the national average.
Terraced rows and post-war semis line most streets here, with the odd flat conversion breaking up the pattern near the busier roads — this is a suburb built for families rather than passers-through, and the density (more than double the national average) tells you these streets fill up fast with cars, wheelie bins and school-run traffic. It doesn't have the polish of London's more manicured corners, but it doesn't try to.
The schools are the strongest card this area holds. The Heathland School and St Mark's Catholic School, both Outstanding-rated secondaries, sit alongside St Michael and St Martin Catholic Primary School, also Outstanding — a genuinely unusual concentration for one suburb, and it's the single clearest reason families settle here rather than just pass through. Set against that, transport is workaday rather than impressive: 30 local stops but a transport grade that sits mid-table, so this reads more like a bus-and-drive suburb than a rail commuter's dream. Housing is where the numbers get interesting — a median house price of £429,000 undercuts the borough of Hounslow by around 7%, yet still comes in well above the national median, and semi-detached homes here (the dominant type, mostly freehold) fetch over double what a semi costs nationally. A For Sale board on one of these streets is advertising a family freehold at a relative discount within an expensive borough, not a bargain in any absolute sense.
Green space is generous for inner London — 15 sites and over 90 hectares give this suburb far more breathing room per head than the regional norm, which matters when the housing stock is dense and gardens are modest. That environment grade is the best in the whole profile, and it shows: this is a place people use the outdoors rather than admire it from a window. The harder truth sits in the safety figures. Crime here runs well above the borough's own average, dominated by violence and anti-social behaviour rather than burglary or car crime, and the health grade lags noticeably behind the area's other strengths — a D+ against an otherwise solid B/A picture is the one grade that doesn't fit the story the rest of the data tells. House prices have been drifting upward gently rather than sharply, and safety itself has stayed flat rather than improving, so neither trend is dramatic in either direction.
This suits people who've made peace with a trade: exceptional schooling and genuinely good green space, in exchange for a suburb that's rougher round the edges than its borough average and lighter on rail links than commuters might want. Income and deprivation deciles sit in the lower-middle band nationally, which tracks with what you see on the ground — solid family housing, not affluence. Anyone weighing this up should walk the streets near the schools they're targeting and separately check the health and crime picture for their exact road, because the borough-wide averages hide real variation block to block.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.