Village · 849 residents
Very good · better than 8 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Civil parish boundary
Horsley scores 70/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for transport (79) and affordability (77).
It scores lowest on food & drink (35).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Horsley in East Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Stone cottages and low brick terraces sit close to the road here, with the odd detached house set back behind a hedge — the kind of village where the housing stock tells you it grew slowly, over a long time, rather than being dropped in by a developer. There's no crowd of shopfronts to speak of; this is a place people live in rather than pass through, and the population count — barely over a thousand — backs that up.
Practically speaking, this is not a commuter-belt village built around a station clock; the picture here is more local than that. Horsley Woodhouse Primary School carries a Good Ofsted rating, and with a median age pushing 50, the age profile skews well past the school-run years — this reads more as a settled, established community than a young family feeder village, though the primary provision is solid for those who are here. Housing is dominated by freehold terraces and a decent slice of detached homes, and at a median of £300,000 you're paying above both the national and regional medians, and comfortably above the £215,000 typical for Amber Valley district as a whole — this is one of the pricier corners of its own council area, even if it looks unremarkable against national wealth hotspots.
Green space is generous relative to the size of the place — five sites totalling over 66 hectares is a lot of ground for a village this size — and that shapes the rhythm of life more than any restaurant strip does, because there isn't one to speak of in this data. What stands out instead is safety: the overall grade here is firmly strong, crime is trending in the right direction, and the antisocial-behaviour and theft figures sit well down the list behind violence and sexual offences, which itself is a modest 50 incidents over the year in a small population. The one grade that breaks the pattern is health, sitting at a C+ against an otherwise A-grade profile — worth noting if local healthcare access matters to you, even though nothing else in the picture suggests a struggling place.
This suits someone who wants space, quiet, and a slower pace over convenience — people who've already done the commuting years, or who work from home and don't need a station on the doorstep. It's less suited to anyone wanting nightlife, restaurant variety, or a fast train line at the end of the street, none of which feature here. What you're paying the Amber Valley premium for is the green space and the safety record, not the amenities.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.