Neighbourhood · 15,000 residents
Good · better than 6 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — electoral ward boundary, used as the nearest surveyed shape
Hornsey scores 61/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (79) and food & drink (74).
It scores lowest on affordability (20) and infrastructure (36).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Hornsey in London, each measured against the national average.
Hornsey's terraces give it away before anything else does: tight Victorian streets of bay-fronted houses carved into flats, the odd Edwardian semi holding out on a corner, and a population dense enough that you're never far from a front door. It attracts a particular kind of Londoner — thirty-something, likely renting or on a first purchase, drawn by proximity to the city without the price tag of Crouch End next door or Highbury across the tracks.
The practical picture centres on Hornsey station, and it does a lot of work for this postcode: a direct line into the centre that makes the commute genuinely liveable for someone who wants a garden flat rather than a shoebox further in. Schools are the quiet strength here — the borough-wide average Ofsted profile undersells it, because St Mary's CofE Primary and Greig City Academy both carry Good ratings and a progress 8 score at Greig that's comfortably positive, enough that a family arriving with young children has real, walkable options rather than a lottery. Housing itself tells its own story: leasehold flats dominate the market by a wide margin, freeholds are the minority holding, and a median price a touch below Haringey's borough figure suggests you're paying for the area without quite paying Crouch End rates — though the flat five-year price trend means anyone banking on quick equity growth should recalibrate that expectation.
Green space is modest rather than generous — sixteen pockets scattered through the area rather than one big draw, so weekend life tends to be local and improvised: a walk round the block, a coffee on the high street, rather than a set-piece park visit. Nightlife and environment both score well against the national picture, which matches the feel of a place with enough independent café and restaurant turnover to keep a Saturday interesting without ever feeling like a destination postcode. Health provision reads as merely adequate rather than a selling point, and that's worth sitting with rather than skating past.
Safety is the area's most interesting contradiction. The overall grade sits solidly mid-table-plus, and the trend is flat rather than worsening — no deterioration to worry about. But the raw crime rate compared with Haringey as a whole is roughly double, driven by anti-social behaviour and violent crime sharing the top of the charge sheet almost equally. That's the one number in this piece worth remembering: a borough-benchmarked area that otherwise reads as comfortable, well-schooled and commutable, sitting on a crime rate that doesn't match that story. Affordability is the other soft spot — the area sits low on the income decile despite mid-table house prices, meaning the numbers work better for dual earners or established buyers than for anyone stretching on a single income. This suits someone who wants the commute and the schools and is prepared to look past the crime figures with open eyes rather than rose-tinted ones.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.