Village · 1,236 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Highnam scores 82/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (95) and environment (75).
It scores lowest on food & drink (38).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Highnam in South West, each measured against the national average.
Detached houses behind hedges, gravel drives, the odd horsebox parked up — Highnam reads as a village built almost entirely around one house type and one kind of buyer. Of the recent sales here, the overwhelming majority were detached freehold homes, nothing new-build, nothing leasehold in sight. A For Sale board on this street is telling you the same story every time: a family-sized house, owned outright in the legal sense, bought to stay in rather than flip.
That impression holds up against the numbers. This sits among the less deprived parts of the country, and the median house price runs well above what you'd pay across Tewkesbury district as a whole — not a small gap, either, closer to two-thirds higher. It's a place people move to once they've already done well, not a first rung on the ladder. The median age nudges towards fifty, a decade or so older than the national picture, which fits a village of settled owners rather than young renters cycling through. For schooling, Highnam CofE Primary Academy is the one school actually in the village, rated Good and taking a couple of hundred pupils — solid, local, the kind of school that anchors a place rather than draws people to it from afar. There's no rail station listed for the village itself, so this reads as a driving life more than a commuting one; the fourteen local transport stops suggest bus links rather than a fast line into a city.
Green space is modest rather than generous — four plots covering a little over four hectares, proportionally less than the regional average per head, so this isn't a village defined by sprawling parkland, more by gardens and the surrounding countryside doing the work instead. There's no named restaurant or pub in the picture here, and with a population of well under a hundred recorded for the immediate area, day-to-day life likely means driving into Gloucester or a neighbouring village for a proper choice of places to eat. What stands out instead is safety: the overall grade sits at the top of the scale, and violent and sexual offences — the single largest crime category nationally as well as here — show up as a small handful of incidents over the year, not a pattern. That safety grade is flat year on year, which in a village this size just means quiet stays quiet.
This suits someone who has already decided they want space, privacy, and a slower register of life, and who doesn't mind driving for their weekly shop, their night out, or their commute. It's less suited to anyone wanting a walkable high street buzz, a wide school choice, or a quick rail hop to a city — those things simply aren't part of the deal here. The trade-off is plain rather than hidden: you're paying a premium, in both house price and daily convenience, for quiet and elbow room.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.