Suburb · 65 residents
Good · better than 3 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Higher Irlam scores 55/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (72).
It scores lowest on food & drink (30).
Safety isn't scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Higher Irlam in North West, each measured against the national average.
Higher Irlam reads as terraced-and-semi streets, pebble-dashed and unshowy, the kind of place where the cars parked outside are ordinary family cars rather than statements. It sits on the edge of Salford without feeling like an inner-city extension of it — quieter, more settled, built around routine rather than reinvention.
The housing stock does most of the talking here. Semi-detached homes dominate the sales, freehold is the norm rather than the exception, and there's essentially no new-build churn — this is an established area, not one still being assembled. A median sale price around £230,000 puts it modestly above its parent authority of Salford, and comfortably below the national median, which tells you this is a place people buy into for stability rather than status. Three primary schools serve the area — Moss Valley Primary Academy, St Joseph the Worker RC Primary, and Irlam Endowed Primary — a proper spread of academy, Catholic voluntary-aided, and Church of England voluting-controlled options, though none carry a published Ofsted rating in this data, so you'd want to check current inspection reports directly rather than assume.
Day-to-day, this is a place shaped by full-fibre broadband reaching the vast majority of homes and council tax bands sitting close to the national median — practical, unglamorous, functional. The grades tell a consistent story: solid marks for affordability, connectivity, and housing, a middling one for health services, and nightlife that's frankly an afterthought here — this isn't a place that fills its evenings with restaurants and bars, and the data doesn't pretend otherwise. Green space allowance is a touch below both the regional and national averages, so it's not a park-dense suburb, but population density is well under the national norm too, meaning space between houses still feels more generous than the numbers for green space alone might suggest.
The median age of 41 fits a place settled by families and long-term owners rather than a churn of renters — turnover here is barely above 1.5%, in line with the national picture, meaning once people arrive, they tend to stay. That's the real signal in this data: not dramatic growth, not decline, just a suburb ticking along on freehold semis and steady schools, suited to people who want a mortgage that behaves predictably and a street that doesn't change much year to year. Anyone hoping for a livelier centre or a wider choice of evening options will find that gap real, and worth weighing against everything else that's quietly working here.
Safety isn’t scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.