Village · 684 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
High Ackworth scores 74/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for affordability (84) and environment (84).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for High Ackworth in Yorkshire and The Humber, each measured against the national average.
Detached houses on generous plots, stone boundary walls, the kind of quiet where you notice a car passing — High Ackworth reads as a settled, older village rather than a commuter dormitory, and the streets confirm it before any statistic does.
The people here skew well past the national average age, and that shapes everything else. This isn't a village geared around school runs and rail commutes so much as one where people have already arrived, in the settled sense of the word — bought their house, raised their family, stayed. Ackworth Howard Church of England Junior and Infant School carries a Good Ofsted rating and takes the primary-age children who are around, but with a population this small and skewed older, you're not looking at a place full of young families. Housing sales lean heavily towards detached homes held freehold — nine out of nine in the local sample — which is the classic signature of a village that was built for families with equity, not first-time buyers stretching for a foothold. The median price sits close to £352,500, and against the wider Wakefield district that's a premium of over 80%, which tells you plainly that High Ackworth is the expensive corner of an otherwise affordable borough.
That affordability grading of A makes sense once you see the income and deprivation figures: decile 8 for deprivation and decile 9 for income put this among the more comfortable parts of the country, not just the region. Green space is tight rather than expansive — one recorded space of half a hectare — so this isn't a village built around sprawling parkland; whatever outdoor life exists here happens on a smaller, more local scale, with the surrounding countryside doing the heavier lifting. Full fibre broadband reaches the vast majority of homes, which matters more than it used to now that plenty of residents likely work from home or are retired and connected. The one figure that jars against the otherwise comfortable picture is crime: the annual count itself is low in absolute terms, but measured as a rate it comes in well above the Wakefield average, and violence and sexual offences account for nearly four in ten incidents logged. Safety is graded B and holding flat rather than improving or worsening — not alarming, but worth sitting with rather than skipping past, especially since it's the one grade that doesn't match the affluent, settled tone of everything else.
This is a village that suits people who've already done the hard yards of career and mortgage, who want space, quiet, and a detached house with a garden more than they want nightlife or new-build convenience — there's none of the latter here, with zero new-build sales recorded. It's less convincing as a landing spot for young families chasing outstanding secondary schools or first-time buyers hunting for a starter home; the price premium and the freehold-detached pattern both point away from that. If you're weighing it up, the honest tension is this: comfortable, well-off, high broadband, decent schooling for the few children around — set against a crime rate that runs hotter than its parent borough and a demographic that's ageing rather than renewing itself.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.