Village · 266 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Heath scores 48/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
No topic reaches "very good" (70+); its best is affordability (66).
It scores lowest on health (23).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Heath in Yorkshire and The Humber, each measured against the national average.
Heath is the kind of place where the houses do most of the talking — a scatter of semis and detacheds around a small green, the sort of village that doesn't announce itself with a parade of shops because it doesn't have one. With a population of just 152, this isn't a place you pass through so much as arrive at deliberately.
The property picture here is straightforward: freehold dominates almost completely, semi-detached is the most common form, and the median sale price of £192,500 sits below both the Wakefield and national medians, despite Heath's houses actually being priced slightly under the wider district too. That combination — overwhelmingly freehold, largely semis and terraces, a handful of detached homes at the top — reads as a settled, owner-occupied street rather than one churned by landlords or new-build estates; fittingly, new-build activity here is at zero. The area sits in the second-lowest decile nationally for deprivation and the very lowest for income, which is a more complicated picture than the house prices alone suggest — this is a place where property is cheap relative to the region, but wages haven't followed.
Green space is thin on the ground in the literal sense — one plot, just over a hectare — so this isn't a village built around parkland; whatever outdoor life you build here will mean driving out rather than walking to a recreation ground. Broadband is a genuine strength, though: full fibre reaches 93% of properties, which matters more than it sounds for a place this small and this quiet. On safety, the headline crime grade is respectable, a B, and the overall picture is one of markedly less crime than the Wakefield average — but violence and sexual offences make up nearly half of all recorded incidents, the one figure in the profile worth sitting with rather than skimming past. It's the quiet spine of an otherwise reassuring set of grades: environment scores an A, connectivity and affordability both B+, and the overall picture is comfortably above the national average.
The median age of 43.7 — a few years older than both the regional and national norms — tells you who's already here: settled couples and older residents rather than a young commuter crowd, in a village too small to carry its own school or station within its own boundary. This suits someone who wants quiet, cheap-relative-to-the-region property and fast broadband, and who is comfortable sourcing schools, shops, and days out from neighbouring towns rather than the village itself. It's a harder fit if you want walkable green space, nightlife, or the reassurance of amenities on your own doorstep.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.