Neighbourhood · 16,391 residents
Good · better than 7 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — electoral ward boundary, used as the nearest surveyed shape
Havering-atte-Bower scores 64/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (88) and safety (77).
It scores lowest on food & drink (34) and health (36).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Havering-atte-Bower in London, each measured against the national average.
Havering-atte-Bower sits at the edge of things — the kind of village-shaped pocket where a green, a church, and a scatter of detached and semi-detached houses do most of the talking, and the traffic noise of outer London feels a long way off. It attracts an older crowd than you'd expect this close to the city: the median age here is nearly 47, well above the London norm, and the streets have that settled, low-turnover feel of people who bought once and stayed.
There's no rail station in the village itself, so this isn't one for anyone tethered to a daily train commute — you're looking at a drive or a bus link to pick up trains elsewhere, and the eight local transport stops confirm this is a driving sort of place rather than a station-adjacent one. Schooling is a mixed picture: Dame Tipping Church of England Primary is rated Good, as is Bower Park Academy for secondary, but the academy's progress-8 score sits well below average, so families weighing secondary options will want to look at that closely rather than assume "Good" tells the whole story. On the housing side, freehold houses dominate almost entirely — this is overwhelmingly a place people own outright rather than rent or lease, with terraced and semi-detached homes trading in the high £300,000s to £500,000s, comfortably above the England-wide median but actually a touch cheaper than Havering borough as a whole.
The green space is the real asset — four sites covering over 70 hectares for a population of under 900 people, a ratio most London suburbs can't touch, and it shapes the rhythm of life here more than any high street would. There isn't much in the way of restaurants or nightlife to speak of, so weekends lean toward the outdoors and the drive-out rather than the doorstep. Crime sits low in absolute terms — 56 incidents across the past year, mostly violence and anti-social behaviour categories that dominate nationally too — but the borough-relative comparison is startling: the rate here runs nearly four times higher than the Havering average, a genuine outlier worth sitting with rather than dismissing, even if the raw numbers stay modest because so few people live here. It's the one discordant note in an otherwise calm, green, well-off profile.
This suits people who've already done the commuting years and want space, quiet, and a garden more than convenience — retirees, established families with a car in the drive, anyone who finds the idea of a village green more appealing than a station platform. It's less suited to someone who needs a fast rail link into central London or wants an evening economy on the doorstep. The trade-off is straightforward: you're buying calm and land, not proximity.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.