Village · 112 residents
Good · better than 7 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Hartest scores 67/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (88) and transport (72).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Hartest in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Detached houses on generous plots, a scatter of period brick and flint, and almost no passing traffic — that's the first impression of Hartest, and it's largely the correct one. This is a village in the true sense: a small resident population, a single working green, and the kind of quiet that estate agents don't need to embellish.
The numbers behind that quiet are genuinely reassuring. Twelve months of recorded crime here amounts to a handful of incidents, and the trend is flat rather than rising, which in a place this size means very little happens from one season to the next. Hartest Church of England Primary School carries a Good rating for the village's youngest children, and if you want Outstanding, All Saints' Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary in nearby Lawshall covers that ground — between the two, a family here has proper choice without needing to look at a city. Housing is where the picture sharpens: nine recent sales were all freehold, mostly detached, with a median price around £520,000 — comfortably above both the Babergh district figure and the wider regional median. A For Sale board in Hartest is not advertising a starter home; it's advertising a settled, established property, the kind bought once and kept.
Green space is modest in acreage but woven into daily life rather than parcelled off — this isn't a village built around a park, it's a village that sits inside farmland, and the walking, dog-owning rhythm of the place reflects that. There's no rail station in the immediate picture here, so this isn't a commuter-belt outpost in the conventional sense; you're more likely to be working from home, farming, retired, or driving to a station elsewhere than stepping onto a platform on the doorstep. That fits the median age of low fifties — noticeably older than the national average — and points to a population who chose Hartest for permanence rather than proximity to an office.
The single mismatch worth naming: strong grades across safety, transport links and affordability sit against a lower mark for housing itself, which tracks with the price gap noted above — you're paying well above the regional norm to be here, and the trade-off is space and quiet rather than value. This suits people who've already done their career commuting elsewhere and want somewhere settled, or those who work from home and don't need to be near a station at all. It won't suit anyone chasing nightlife, diversity of shops, or a fast, cheap way into a city — none of that exists in a place this small, and pretending otherwise would be the real regret.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.