Neighbourhood · 13,477 residents
Very good · better than 8 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — electoral ward boundary, used as the nearest surveyed shape
Harold Wood scores 70/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (76) and environment (75).
It scores lowest on food & drink (38).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Harold Wood in London, each measured against the national average.
Harold Wood reads as pebble-dashed semis and post-war terraces, the kind of streets where a Ford sits on the drive next to a trampoline and nobody's in a rush. It's outer-London suburbia in the fullest sense — not the flat-conversion churn of zone 2, but a settled, family-shaped place that happens to have a station into the city.
That station does a lot of the work here. Harold Wood Station puts this squarely in commuter territory, and with a median age of 36 you're looking at a working population rather than a retirement pocket or a student enclave — people who bought here precisely because the train exists and the postcode still feels like a proper suburb. Schools follow the same pattern: Mead Primary and Broadford Primary are both rated Good, and the secondary offer includes Drapers' Academy, so a family moving here isn't gambling on education even if outstanding grades aren't the headline. On the street, what you'll actually see for sale is a semi or terrace, sold freehold — the market here is 114 freehold sales against 34 leasehold, and semis fetch £450,000 against a national semi median of £273,000, which tells you this is a place people buy into rather than pass through. Against the wider borough of Havering, prices are actually 5.7% softer, so you're not paying the Havering premium for the Harold Wood name, even though Havering's own crime rate sits well above what's recorded locally.
Green space comes in reasonably generous parcels — twelve separate spaces adding up to over 30 hectares, more breathing room per head than the London average — and that shapes the rhythm of the place: dog walks and football kickabouts rather than café culture. There's no long restaurant list to point to here, so this isn't an area that pulls people in for its eating-out scene; it's a place you come home to rather than out to. The borough-wide health picture and the overall grade of B point to a place that functions well on the basics — connectivity, environment, transport all sit at B+ or B — without excelling in any single direction hard enough to headline it.
The one figure worth sitting with is crime. Violence and sexual offences make up three in ten recorded incidents, with anti-social behaviour the next largest share — categories that dominate most urban crime breakdowns and shouldn't be read in isolation, especially with the borough comparison so favourable and the local trend marked as improving rather than worsening. It fits the wider pattern: solid B+ safety grade, a five-year direction moving the right way, no sense of a place going backwards. What you get in Harold Wood is consistency — a family suburb with a working train station, decent schools within reach, gardens rather than balconies, and prices that undercut its own borough. It won't excite you, and it isn't trying to.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.