Neighbourhood · 120 residents
Good · better than 5 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Hackney Marsh scores 60/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (85) and schools (76).
It scores lowest on affordability (18).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Hackney Marsh in London, each measured against the national average.
The streets around Hackney Marsh have that particular East London mix of ex-council low-rise, converted terraces and the odd new-build block, with the actual marshland doing a lot of the work in making the place feel less hemmed-in than the postcode suggests. It attracts a younger crowd on the whole — the median age here sits under 37, a good few years below the national figure — the kind of resident who wants outdoor space without leaving the city behind.
Public transport is thin on the ground in the strictest sense — only a handful of stops serve the immediate area — but the connectivity grade holds up well against the national average, which tells you fibre broadband and general digital infrastructure are doing the heavy lifting rather than buses and trains; over 80% of premises here have full fibre, which matters if home working is part of your plan. Schools are the standout on paper, graded well above the national norm, so if you've got children the local options are a genuine draw rather than a compromise. Housing tells its own story: leasehold flats dominate the small sample of recent sales, split evenly with a smaller freehold contingent of houses, and the median sale price of £590,000 sits meaningfully above both the national and London medians — this is a leasehold-flat market, priced for it, and about 7% pricier than the Hackney borough average, which is itself no bargain.
Green space is the obvious pull — the Marsh itself gives you room to run, cycle or just get away from the flat-fronted streets, and it's the kind of asset that shapes how people spend their free time here more than any restaurant strip could. Health outcomes are graded solidly mid-table against the rest of the country, which is reassuring without being remarkable. The harder conversation is safety: anti-social behaviour is comfortably the largest single category of recorded crime, followed by violence and theft from the person, and the borough-wide comparison is stark — crime rates here run over 1,300% above the Hackney average, with the local trend marked as worsening rather than settling. That's the one grade that breaks the pattern in an otherwise strong set — schools, connectivity and housing all read well above average, while safety sits mid-table on its own grade but is clearly under pressure underneath. Affordability is the other soft spot, graded poorly against the national picture, consistent with an income decile that puts this among the less affluent slices of the country despite the house prices — a reminder that high property values and local earning power don't always move together.
This is a place that suits someone who values outdoor space and decent schools enough to manage the trade-offs elsewhere — the transport thinness, the safety trend, the gap between what homes cost and what the area itself can comfortably support on local incomes. Renters looking at a median of £2,635 a month, or buyers eyeing that leasehold-flat market, are paying London prices for a suburb that still feels like it's finding its footing on crime. Whether that's a price worth paying depends on how much weight you put on green space and school quality against the reality of a rising anti-social behaviour count on your street.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.