Neighbourhood · 24,334 residents
Good · better than 3 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Greenford Park scores 56/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for schools (70) and environment (70).
It scores lowest on food & drink (26) and affordability (28).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Greenford Park in London, each measured against the national average.
Terraced Edwardian and inter-war streets dominate here, packed close in that dense west London way, with a scatter of semis breaking up the rows and flats filling the gaps near the main roads. It's a place built for families who've been here a generation or two rather than a magnet for anyone chasing a scene — the kind of suburb where the front gardens are paved for a second car and the corner shops know your order.
The numbers back up that family-first read: median age sits at 37.7, schools carry an overall A grade locally, and Stanhope Primary and Dormers Wells Primary both hold Good Ofsted ratings, while Cardinal Wiseman Catholic School posts a solid 0.83 progress8 score for secondary leavers. What you won't get is an easy rail commute — the transport grade lands at a middling C+, and with 31 stops but no standout station in the data, this reads as bus-and-Tube territory rather than a mainline dash into town. Housing leans hard towards terraced freeholds — 28 of 68 recent sales were terraces, and 48 of 68 were freehold — so a For Sale board here usually means a proper house with a garden, not a share of freehold flat, though at a median of £536,500 you're paying a premium versus the England-wide £281,000, if a shade under the £630,766 London average.
Green space is genuinely generous for the density — 46 hectares across 18 sites for a population of 15,252, well above the national rate per head — and that's the release valve in a borough this packed (population density here is nearly triple the national average). Health grades come out at B+, matching the environment score, so the physical fabric of the place — air, parks, GP access — outperforms what the raw deprivation figures might suggest; imd decile 4 and income decile 2 put Greenford Park in the less affluent half nationally, and the affordability grade of D+ tells the same story from the housing-cost angle. Crime is the one grade that jars against the calmer picture elsewhere: safety is graded B+, but the borough comparison shows the local crime rate running 69.6% above the Ealing average, driven mostly by violence and anti-social behaviour, which together account for over half of all recorded incidents. That's worth sitting with rather than skating past — it's the one place where the data pulls against the leafy-suburb feel of the rest of the picture.
This suits people who want a family house with a garden, decent local schools, and green space on the doorstep, and who are prepared to trade a fast commute and a lower crime rate for it. If nightlife or a quick hop into central London matters more to you than school catchments, you'll feel the gap here — the D nightlife grade isn't an oversight, it's accurate. If what you want is space, schools, and parks in a borough that costs less than Ealing's own average, Greenford Park delivers that trade cleanly, so long as you've made peace with the crime figures first.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.