Suburb · 4,204 residents
Fair · better than 2 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Green Bank scores 52/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (95) and affordability (78).
It scores lowest on safety (16).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Green Bank in North West, each measured against the national average.
Terraced rows dominate the streets here, tightly packed and mostly leasehold, the kind of housing stock that speaks to a place built around work rather than aspiration. Green Bank sits dense — more people per hectare than the national average — and it reads that way on the ground, with St Helens Central and Lea Green rail stations both within reach and 63 transport stops threaded through a small suburb. It attracts people who've been here a while: the median age of 39.5 tracks close to the national figure, suggesting settled households rather than a transient young crowd.
The practical picture is where Green Bank pulls in two directions at once. Housing is genuinely affordable — a median price of £118,000 is roughly a third below what you'd pay elsewhere in St Helens, and less than half the regional average, which is why the area grades A on affordability. But schooling is the softer spot: with an average Progress 8 score deep in negative territory, the numbers suggest pupils here are, on average, achieving well below their expected grades by the end of secondary school. The Sutton Academy, rated Good by Ofsted, is the more reassuring option in the mix, but it sits inside a school grade (C+) that doesn't match the confidence of the transport or affordability picture. That mismatch — decent connections and cheap housing against patchy school outcomes — is the trade-off to sit with before signing anything.
Green space is thin on the ground, just under three hectares split across four sites, so this isn't an area built around long walks or weekend picnics; life here happens more in the terraces and high street than in parkland. Health outcomes buck the general pattern, though — the area grades A+ on health, which is a genuine point in its favour given everything else. Safety is the harder conversation: violence and sexual offences account for over a third of recorded crime, and shoplifting and public order make up much of the rest, producing a D+ safety grade that sits well out of step with the A-grade transport and affordability around it. The direction of travel is at least encouraging — safety trends are marked as improving, even if the current baseline is high, and crime here runs many times above the St Helens borough average, which is worth sitting with rather than skating past.
This is a place that suits someone who wants low housing costs, easy rail access into the wider North West, and is realistic about what a dense, lower-income suburb brings with it — a stretched school system and a safety picture still working its way back from a difficult base. It's less suited to anyone prioritising green space or top-tier school results above all else. The bones — transport, affordability, health — are solid; the question is whether you can live comfortably alongside the rougher edges while they improve.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.