Suburb · 178 residents
Fair · better than 3 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Great Oakley scores 54/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for affordability (76).
It scores lowest on food & drink (10) and health (22).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Great Oakley in East Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Great Oakley reads as detached houses on quiet plots, gravel drives, and not much passing traffic — the kind of village-edge suburb where the school run and the dog walk are the two fixed points of the day. The population sits under twelve hundred, and at a median age of 48.5 against a national figure closer to 40, this isn't a place thick with young families or twenty-something renters. It's settled, and it looks it.
The property picture backs that up plainly: detached houses dominate the sales here, freehold is the overwhelming norm, and with a median price around £243,500 — both below the North Northamptonshire parent figure and well under the national average — a For Sale board here says "family house, bought outright, staying put" rather than "buy-to-let" or "first rung on the ladder." Detached homes do sell for less than the national detached median, which tells you this is value without the premium postcode markup. Schooling is thinner on named detail, but Kingswood Primary Academy and Geddington Church of England Primary School are both here, and the area's overall schools grade sits comfortably mid-table — solid, not spectacular. Transport is the trade-off: a single local stop, no rail station in the picture, so this is a driving village, not a commuter-line suburb.
Green space is modest rather than generous — two spaces totalling ten hectares, in a village where you're more likely to know the footpaths than a leaflet's worth of restaurant listings. There isn't a dining scene to speak of here, and that's consistent with the profile: this is a place you live rather than visit, where weekends mean the garden, the car boot to somewhere bigger, or a walk out past the last house on the lane. The safety grade is the standout in an otherwise steady set of B-pluses — an A, well above the pattern around it — though it sits oddly alongside a raw crime rate that reads far higher than the parent authority's average. That gap is worth sitting with: violence and anti-social behaviour make up two-thirds of recorded incidents, which in a village this small can mean a handful of events skewing the per-capita numbers heavily rather than a genuine daily unease. Health is the other outlier, graded C against neighbours that are otherwise comfortably above average — not alarming, but not a strength either.
This suits someone who has already decided they want space, quiet, and a level of self-sufficiency over convenience — someone who drives everywhere, values a large freehold home over a short commute, and isn't looking for evening life on the doorstep. It's less suited to anyone who needs a train line at the end of the road or a choice of restaurants on a Friday night. The regret risk here isn't the place itself — it's mismatching your daily rhythm to a village that offers space and settledness, and expecting it to also offer buzz.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.