Village · 200 residents
Good · better than 5 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Civil parish boundary
Great Glemham scores 63/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (83) and transport (78).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Great Glemham in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Great Glemham is the kind of place where the houses sit well apart from each other, hedgerows and open fields doing the work that pavements and streetlights do elsewhere, and the few dozen rooftops you can see are mostly detached and mostly old brick or render. There's no high street to speak of, no parade of shops to read the local mood from — the mood here is set by the land itself, and by the sort of person who wants distance between themselves and the next front door.
That character shows up squarely in the numbers on housing. The two recent sales here were both detached freeholds, at a median price of £657,500 — comfortably above the East Suffolk figure and priced among the top slice nationally. This isn't a village that dipped in relative wealth, either: on the broader deprivation measure it sits at a middling decile, so the money here is real but the place hasn't been remodelled into a showpiece — it's simply where people with means have chosen to live quietly. A median age in the low fifties tells the same story from another angle: this is not a village geared around young families or first commutes, but around people settled into a later, steadier chapter of life.
Day-to-day life is small and self-contained rather than social in the café-and-restaurant sense — there's no cluster of eateries or named food venue to build a Saturday around here, and with only three green spaces covering just over a hectare between them, this isn't a village of sprawling parkland either; the appeal is the wider Suffolk countryside beyond the boundary, not amenity within it. What you do get is a strikingly low crime count — six incidents across the year — and a safety grade right at the top of the scale, with the trend still improving. Violence and sexual offences make up the largest single share of that small total, which sounds alarming until you realise "largest share" here means a handful of incidents, not a pattern to plan around. Connectivity is a genuine strength too: full-fibre broadband reaches over four in five homes, which matters more than it might elsewhere, since this is not a village you'd expect to nip out from for entertainment on a whim.
This suits someone past the school-run years, drawn to space and quiet over convenience, comfortable with a longer drive for shopping and social life, and untroubled by paying a premium for detached brick and elbow room. It won't suit anyone wanting a walkable pace of life, a choice of local schools, or evenings out on the doorstep — for that, you're looking at somewhere else in the district, not here.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.