Gelligaer in Wales has a Check Local Score of 69/100 (good), drawn from official data on safety, schools, transport, housing, amenities and the local environment, each measured against the national average — a score of 60 is typical for the country.
Gelligaer sits up on the ridge above the Taff and Rhymney valleys, the sort of place where terraced rows give way to semis with views out over the hills, and the pace on the street is set by dog walkers and school-run parents rather than anyone in a hurry. It's a village in the proper sense — 657 people, one school, a handful of green spaces — and it feels like it, without the retail strip or the passing trade that comes with being on a main road to somewhere else.
The numbers on deprivation put Gelligaer among the more deprived areas of Wales, sitting low on both the income and multiple deprivation scales, yet that doesn't read straightforwardly into the streets themselves: the environment and health grades here are as good as they come, and safety scores strongly too, so this isn't a place where hardship shows up as visible decline. Housing is the plainer story — a typical sale here is a freehold semi, and at a median of £175,000 that's cheaper than the wider Caerphilly borough by a noticeable margin, which is worth knowing if you're comparing against neighbouring villages rather than against Wales as a whole. Schooling is thin on options — Greenhill Primary is the one you'd be looking at, a small community school with under 200 pupils — so anyone with children moving here should expect a single obvious choice rather than a shortlist. Broadband is a genuine strength: full fibre reaches the large majority of properties, which matters more than it once did for anyone working from home on the ridge.
The crime figure is the one number that jars against the rest of the picture. Forty-three incidents over a year sounds modest in isolation, but set against how few people live here, the rate comes out well above the county average, and violence and sexual offences account for close to half of everything recorded — a concentration that's worth sitting with rather than dismissing, even though the area's overall safety grade still lands well. It's the kind of statistic that rewards asking around locally rather than taking as gospel; small populations can turn a handful of incidents into a startling percentage. Green space is limited in raw terms — three pockets, under two hectares between them — but the hills themselves do a lot of the work that a formal park would elsewhere, and the walking is arguably the point rather than a managed pitch or playground. There's no obvious restaurant or pub scene showing up in what's recorded, so evenings out mean a drive rather than a stroll, and the nightlife and connectivity grades reflect that — solidly average, not a place that pulls people in from outside.
This suits someone who wants the hills and a slower street rather than options on the doorstep: settled, older-skewing (median age creeping toward 40), values a fibre connection over a corner shop, and is comfortable with one school and one obvious route into the wider valley. It's a harder sell if you want choice on your doorstep, a broad range of school places, or the reassurance of a crime picture that isn't led so heavily by one serious category — that's the trade-off worth sitting with before you commit.
Data last updated: 15 August 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.