Village · 1,107 residents
Good · better than 4 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Civil parish boundary
Framingham Earl scores 60/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (89) and affordability (73).
It scores lowest on transport (31) and environment (39).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Framingham Earl in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Framingham Earl reads as detached houses on generous plots, hedges rather than fences, and cars parked on driveways rather than kerbs — the kind of village edge where the streetscape does most of the talking before you've read a single statistic. The median age sits a decade above the national figure, and the pace of the place matches that: this isn't somewhere young professionals cluster three-to-a-house, it's somewhere people settle once and stay.
The numbers back up that impression of stability. Nine out of ten areas nationally are more deprived than this one, and incomes sit in the same top band, which puts Framingham Earl among the comfortable corners of the East of England without being flashy about it — the median house price actually sits slightly below both the South Norfolk average and the regional norm, so you're not paying a premium simply for the postcode. What you are buying, in three cases out of four, is a detached freehold home; the sales mix here is overwhelmingly houses-not-flats, owned outright rather than leased, which tells you this is a market built around families and downsizers rather than investors. Framingham Earl High School serves the secondary-age population as an academy with a middling progress score, while Poringland Primary School carries a Good rating nearby — solid rather than exceptional, and worth weighing against the area's own outstanding overall schools grade, which seems to rest more on this being a settled, well-resourced catchment than on headline exam results. Transport is the one flat note in an otherwise strong chord: the connectivity grade is respectable but the transport grade itself lags, and there's no rail station in the picture, so this is a village built around the car.
Green space is present but modest — three pockets of it, barely half a hectare between them, which is thin against the regional average per head. That shapes the weekend rhythm: this isn't a place where you wander into a park with a coffee, it's one where the garden and the surrounding countryside do that job instead. Broadband is solidly modern, with two-thirds of properties on full fibre, so working from that home office is a realistic pattern here, not an aspiration.
The safety picture is the area's clearest strength and its most interesting texture. The overall crime count is low in absolute terms, safety scores at the very top of the national scale, and the year-on-year trend is flat rather than worsening — but within that small number, violence and sexual offences account for nearly half of all recorded incidents, a concentration worth sitting with rather than dismissing, even against a genuinely low base rate. Health and environment grades land in the middle of the pack, average rather than a selling point either way. Put together, this is a village for people who've already decided they want space, quiet, and a garden over convenience and nightlife — the trade-off is a longer relationship with your car and a shorter one with public transport, and anyone weighing it up should be honest with themselves about which of those two they can live without.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.