Suburb · 336 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Fox Hatch scores 72/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (80) and safety (70).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Fox Hatch in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Fox Hatch reads as detached-house territory before you've even parked the car — wide plots, mature hedging, driveways rather than kerbside parking, the kind of streetscape that says families have settled here rather than passed through. At a median age of 47, this isn't a place full of shared houses or young professionals starting out; it's people further along, often with the mortgage well under control.
That property picture holds up when you look at the sales themselves: detached homes dominate, freehold is essentially the only tenure worth mentioning, and nothing here is new-build — this is established housing stock, not a fresh estate. A median sale price of £565,000 sits comfortably above the national figure, though it's worth knowing Fox Hatch actually prices below its wider Brentwood district by around 17%, so within the local context this is the more accessible end rather than the stretch postcode. Nationally, though, it's still a top-decile price bracket, and the income and deprivation deciles (6 and 7) point to a comfortably-off area without being the most affluent corner of the country. Schools reinforce the family read: Doddinghurst Church of England Junior and Doddinghurst Infant are both rated Good, workaday reliable rather than showpiece, which suits a place where people seem to be raising children rather than chasing outstanding league tables. Transport is modest rather than a selling point — three stops locally — so this reads as a driving suburb more than a rail-commuter one.
Green space is doing real work here: 16 hectares across four sites for a population of well under a thousand people is generous, and it shows in the pace of the place — dog walks, garden projects, the unhurried rhythm of a suburb that isn't built around a high street social scene. The grade pattern backs this up almost everywhere: an A for environment, an A for schools, a safety grade that also comes out top-tier, connectivity and housing both comfortably above average. The one figure that doesn't fit the pattern is the crime count itself — 46 incidents in the past year, over a third of them violence and sexual offences, which sounds stark until you remember this is a small population base where a handful of incidents move the percentages sharply. The safety grade itself is rated A and holding flat year on year, so the underlying trend is not one of decline — it's a small place where raw crime figures need reading in proportion, not in isolation.
This is a suburb for people who've already worked out what they want: space, quiet, a garden worth having, and schools that do a solid job without needing to be exceptional. It won't suit anyone chasing a fast rail commute or an evening economy — the nightlife grade sits mid-table and there's no dense restaurant or transport scene woven through the data here. But for a household trading commute time for square footage and calm, it's a coherent, low-drama proposition, and the biggest question is simply whether you're ready for a driving-first, family-paced way of life rather than an urban one.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.