Fisher's Pond in South East has a Check Local Score of 69/100 (good), drawn from official data on safety, schools, transport, housing, amenities and the local environment, each measured against the national average — a score of 60 is typical for the country.
Fisher's Pond is the kind of village where the housing does the talking: detached and semi-detached homes on quiet roads, freehold nearly everywhere, and not a new-build in sight. The sales mix here is dominated by family-sized houses rather than flats, and that shapes who you see about — this isn't a place with a student population or a churn of renters, it's a settled, older-skewing community with a median age around 46, well above the national norm.
On the numbers that matter for day-to-day living, Fisher's Pond sits comfortably. It falls in the eighth decile for deprivation, meaning it's among the less deprived places in the country, and that tracks with what you'd expect from the house prices: a median sale of £510,000, with detached homes fetching £570,000 against a national figure closer to £420,000. Against Winchester, the parent district, prices here actually run about 13% higher — so this is not the affordable corner of the district, it's the pricier one. Schools carry an outright A grade, though the two sampled schools — Owslebury Primary and Upham Church of England Aided Primary — are both small village primaries without published Ofsted ratings in this data; the strength of the local schools grade is likely carried by the wider catchment rather than these two alone. Transport is thinner: a single recorded stop suggests this is a driving village rather than a commuter-rail one, so anyone tied to a daily London or Southampton train should check season-ticket realities before assuming easy access.
The grade pattern tells its own story. Nightlife and safety both score at the top of the scale, environment and housing sit solidly above average, and connectivity is the one grade that lags at a C+ — full fibre reaches under half of properties, which for a village of this size and price point is a genuine gap rather than a rounding error. Crime is very low in absolute terms, just a handful of recorded incidents over the year, though violence and sexual offences account for the largest single share of what little there is — worth noting, though the raw count keeps this in perspective rather than alarm. Green space and the general environment grade point to a place built around gardens, walks and quiet rather than a high street scene; there's no dense restaurant or venue cluster in the data, which fits a village that empties into Winchester or Southampton for a proper night out but keeps its own pace at home.
This suits people who've already decided they want space, quiet and a strong safety profile over transport convenience or fibre broadband, and who can absorb a price premium over the surrounding district for the privilege. It's less suited to anyone needing a fast rail commute or a dense social scene on the doorstep — those trade-offs are real, not cosmetic, and worth sitting with before you commit.
Data last updated: 15 August 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.