Village · 4,488 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Eye scores 49/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (70).
It scores lowest on food & drink (29) and transport (31).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Eye in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Eye still reads as a market village that got bypassed rather than redeveloped: low terraces and detached houses on modest plots, a high street scaled for people who already live there rather than people passing through, and a population under two thousand that keeps the whole place feeling more like a large hamlet than a commuter dormitory. The building stock is the tell — detached homes dominate the recent sales, freehold is the overwhelming norm, and new build barely registers. A For Sale board here is usually on a house that's been in one family for a while, not a developer's show home.
The numbers underline that this is not an expensive corner of the East of England. A median house price around £235,000 sits below both the regional figure and the wider national one, and it's only modestly above what the surrounding Peterborough authority itself commands — this is a place where property is a relative bargain against its own hinterland, let alone the region. Income levels sit low nationally, which tempers any read of the housing figures as a bargain rather than a warning sign about local pay. Broadband tells a different story: full fibre coverage above ninety percent is a genuinely strong position, better than plenty of far larger towns, so working from home here is not the compromise it might look on paper. Schooling is thin rather than weak — Eye CofE Primary is the one school actually in the village, a sizeable voluntary controlled primary, and anyone with older children will be looking outward for secondary provision. Transport is the honest gap: there's no rail station attached to Eye itself, so this only works well for someone who drives or is comfortable with a longer multi-modal commute.
Green space is generous for the size of the place — thirteen separate pieces of it, even if the total hectarage is modest — which suits a village rhythm built around dog walks and allotments rather than destination parks. The grade pattern reinforces that outdoor, connected, settled feel: environment and connectivity both score well above the national average, safety and affordability sit solidly mid-table, and then transport drops away as the one clear soft spot, exactly matching the absence of a station. Crime is where the numbers need a second look — the total incident count is low in absolute terms, but the rate against Peterborough's own average comes out markedly higher, and violence and sexual offences make up close to half of all recorded crime. That's a pattern worth sitting with rather than dismissing: it doesn't necessarily mean the street feels unsafe day to day, but it's a real divergence from the otherwise reassuring grade profile.
This suits someone who wants a slower, fibre-connected village life at a genuinely affordable price, is not reliant on a train station, and is willing to do some homework on schooling and crime patterns beyond the headline safety grade before committing.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.