Village · 342 residents
Good · better than 7 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Ermington scores 67/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (87) and transport (71).
It scores lowest on infrastructure (28).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Ermington in South West, each measured against the national average.
Ermington reads as a scatter of stone cottages and terraces around a village centre, the kind of place where a strange face gets a second glance not from suspicion but because there simply aren't many faces to begin with. This is South Hams countryside proper, and the streetscape says so: freehold terraces and semis, no new-build estates, nothing built to a housebuilder's template.
The practical picture here is a genuine trade-off. There's no rail station in the data for Ermington itself, and with only two transport stops recorded, this isn't a place you commute from lightly — you'd be driving to a station elsewhere in South Hams rather than walking to one. Schools, though, punch reasonably: Ermington Primary School and Holbeton Primary School are both rated Good, small village schools with fewer than ninety pupils apiece, the kind where a teacher knows every child's name. The median age of 49.5 — a decade above the national figure — tells you who's actually living here: settled couples and retirees rather than young families chasing a commute, which fits a village with no rail link at its door.
Property here is modest by the standards of the wider district — a median price a touch below South Hams as a whole — and what sells is mostly terraced freehold stock, the sort of For Sale board that reads "cottage" rather than "development." Day-to-day life runs on a short loop: four small green spaces (just under two and a half hectares between them) for a dog walk or a bit of air, and whatever the village itself can support given a population small enough that the pub and the shop probably know your order. There isn't a restaurant scene to speak of in what's recorded here, and that's the honest shape of a small village rather than a market town. Broadband is a genuine soft spot — just over half of properties have full fibre, and the connectivity grade sits well below everything else on the scorecard, a D+ against a run of Bs and As elsewhere. If you work from home and need to be online reliably, that's worth checking on your actual street before anything else.
The crime figures need reading carefully: the raw count is vanishingly small, so percentage shares of a handful of incidents shouldn't be mistaken for a pattern — and the safety grade itself sits at the top of the scale, an A, alongside strong marks for transport access to the wider road network, environment and health. That combination — very low deprivation concerns (mid-table on the national deprivation index but comfortably placed on income), decent schools, strong safety, weak broadband — makes Ermington a place that suits people who've already decided they want quiet over convenience: retirees, established couples, anyone who can work flexibly or doesn't need to commute daily. It would likely frustrate someone who needs a fast rail link or fibre broadband on day one, and there's little here for those wanting choice in eating out or nightlife. For everyone else, it's a low-drama, well-kept corner of Devon that isn't trying to be anything else.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.