Village · 780 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official settlement boundary (National Records of Scotland)
Ecclefechan scores 41/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (86) and environment (71).
It scores lowest on property market (24) and transport (31).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Ecclefechan in Scotland, each measured against the national average.
Ecclefechan sits low and quiet off the old road between Lockerbie and Annan, the kind of place where a stone cottage and a working farm gate can share the same short street. It doesn't announce itself. There's no strip of shops to read, just the sense of a settlement that has stayed roughly the same size and shape for a long time, and residents who like it that way.
The numbers behind that impression are telling in their own right: a median age of 52.3 against a Scotland-wide average of 42.8 says this is a place people settle into rather than pass through, and a population density a fraction of the national figure confirms the space around each house is real, not decorative. Housing here is inexpensive by any measure — a median price of £166,678, well under what you'd pay across most of Scotland — and the trend line has been gently improving rather than spiking, which suggests steady demand rather than speculation. Broadband is a mixed picture: just over half of properties have full fibre, so it's workable for remote work but not guaranteed street by street, worth checking before you commit to a home office. There's a single school serving the village, which shapes family life here as much as any commute would — if you have older children, you're likely looking further afield for secondary options.
The character grades tell a story the price tag doesn't. Health and environment both score exceptionally well — this is a place where the air, the surroundings, and general wellbeing indicators genuinely outperform, backed by the four green spaces that, though modest in total acreage, are clearly enough for a village this size to breathe. Safety sits more modestly, at average, and connectivity — meaning digital and transport links together — lags behind the rest of the picture. Nightlife, oddly for somewhere this small, scores well above average, which likely reflects a pub or two doing proper trade rather than any real scene. The one grade that jars against all this is housing quality, marked down even as prices stay low and trending upward — an old-stone-stock signal as much as anything, meaning the properties themselves may need investment even where the market is forgiving.
This suits someone who has already decided that space, quiet, and a slower register matter more than convenience — a retiree, a remote worker who's checked their fibre line, someone escaping density rather than seeking it. It suits less well anyone who needs fast connectivity guaranteed, a wide school choice on the doorstep, or a lively social calendar within walking distance. The trade-off here isn't hidden: you're buying calm and land for your money, at some cost to infrastructure and buzz.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.