Village · 392 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Denver scores 50/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (80) and environment (76).
It scores lowest on transport (31) and health (32).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Denver in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Denver sits low and quiet against the Fens, the kind of place where detached houses on generous plots outnumber almost everything else and the traffic you hear is more likely a tractor than a bus. It's small enough that you'd learn the postmen's names within a month. The average age here nudges 51, well above the national median of 40, and that shows in the pace: this is not a place that hums with young energy so much as one that has settled into itself.
There's no rail station in the immediate picture, so anyone weighing up a daily commute needs to be honest about the drive that involves — this is a village built around cars and lanes, not platforms, and the transport grade (a middling C against strong marks elsewhere) reflects that plainly. Schooling is a more reassuring story: Denver Voluntary Controlled Primary School and Hilgay Riverside Academy are both rated Good, modest in size at just over a hundred and around seventy pupils respectively, the kind of small-school setting where a child is a name, not a number. Housing leans heavily towards detached freehold homes — of a small recent sample, six of ten sales were detached and every single one was freehold — so a For Sale board here is almost always advertising outright ownership of a standalone house, not a share of a block or a leasehold flat. Prices, at a median around £252,500, sit a little below the wider district of King's Lynn and West Norfolk and well under the regional average, which is worth noting given the area's affordability grade comes out strong (B+) even though the housing grade itself is more middling, pulled down perhaps by the thinness of choice rather than the cost.
Green space is present but not abundant — four pockets totalling under six hectares, modest against the regional average per head — so this isn't a village of sprawling parkland, more one where the surrounding Fen farmland does the work that a park might elsewhere. There isn't much of a restaurant or nightlife scene to speak of in the data, though the nightlife grade (B+) suggests what's here is well regarded rather than extensive. The safety picture is the quiet spine of this piece: an overall safety grade of A, and yet almost half of the handful of recorded incidents were violence and sexual offences — a striking share, though against a backdrop of numbers so small that a single-figure swing shifts the percentages considerably. It reads less as a warning and more as a reminder that in a village this size, statistics behave differently than in a town.
This suits someone who wants a slower register of life — older residents, people who've done the commuting years and want out of them, or families happy to trade a wider choice of secondary schools and restaurants for a Good primary school and a house with room to breathe. It asks a trade-off in return: you'll need your own transport, your entertainment will mostly be self-made, and the sense of anonymity that comes with a busier postcode simply isn't on offer here.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.