Town · 5,006 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Dartmouth scores 79/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for food & drink (87) and health (86).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Dartmouth in South West, each measured against the national average.
Steep streets, whitewashed frontages, boats in the harbour rather than cars on driveways in the old centre — Dartmouth reads as a place built for looking at water, not commuting past it. You notice the age of the crowd before anything else: a median age approaching 55 tells you this is a town of people who have already made their career decisions, not one filling up with young families chasing school catchments.
There's no railway station here, and that absence shapes everything else about who ends up living in Dartmouth — this is a place you choose because you want to be in Dartmouth, not because it gets you somewhere else easily. Sixty-four bus stops keep the town moving locally, and connectivity scores well for a village of this size, but if your working life depends on a daily commute to a city, this isn't the base for it. Schooling is thin rather than absent: Dartmouth Academy takes pupils all the way through, rated Good, though its progress8 score sits below zero, meaning pupils on average make less academic progress here than the national picture would predict — worth sitting with if you have secondary-age children rather than toddlers. St John the Baptist Catholic Primary is smaller and unrated in this data. On housing, the terraced Victorian and Georgian stock that dominates the sample sells freehold more often than not, and at a median around £275,000 to £339,000 it undercuts both the South Hams average and the national one — a rare pocket where the parent district is pricier than the village itself, by roughly 4%.
The numbers that matter for daily life are almost uniformly reassuring, which makes the one exception worth naming plainly. Health, environment and nightlife all score at the top of the scale, and with 28 green spaces packed into a small footprint, there's real room to walk, sit, or launch a boat without leaving town. Safety, too, rates strongly overall — but the crime breakdown underneath tells a sharper story: violence and sexual offences make up close to half of all recorded incidents, a heavier share than you'd expect from a village this size and this affluent-looking. Burglary and vehicle crime are almost non-events by comparison. It's the kind of statistic that sits oddly against the postcard exterior, and it's worth asking a local rather than assuming the harbour views tell the whole story. Broadband is decent without being exceptional — a little over half of premises on full fibre, which is fine for streaming and video calls but not class-leading.
Income here sits below the national middle, even though the area itself is judged only moderately deprived — a village where the working economy doesn't quite match the house prices or the setting, often a sign of retirement money and second homes doing some of the lifting. That combination — older residents, modest wages, a harbour economy, and housing that's cheaper than you'd guess from the photos — points toward people who've arrived rather than grown up here: retirees, remote workers untethered from a commute, or those buying a slower pace of life with eyes open to the trade-offs. It suits someone who wants scenery and community over convenience, and who's done the sums on schools and safety detail rather than taking the overall picture at face value.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.