Suburb · 220 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Dales Green scores 50/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for affordability (83).
It scores lowest on food & drink (17) and health (22).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Dales Green in West Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Dales Green is mostly semis and terraces on quiet, unremarkable streets — the kind of place where the housing stock does the talking rather than any high street scene, because there isn't much of one to speak of. It's a small pocket, only a few hundred people, packed in fairly tightly for a suburb, and the age profile skews older than the national average: this reads as a place people settle into rather than pass through.
Money-wise, it sits comfortably mid-table — decile 7 for deprivation, decile 8 for income, which puts it among the more comfortable parts of the country without being anywhere near the top. Housing prices this out clearly: a typical property here goes for around £230,000, about a fifth higher than the wider Newcastle-under-Lyme borough, but well below the national median once you account for the mix. Freehold semis and terraces dominate the sales here, almost nothing leasehold, almost nothing new-build — this is settled, resale housing stock, not a place still being built out. A detached house here goes for £295,000 against a national figure well over £400,000, and terraces sell for a third less than the country as a whole. For the money, you're buying space rather than postcode prestige.
Schools are the soft spot in an otherwise decent picture. Castle Primary and Thursfield Primary are both rated Good, solid rather than exceptional, and that C+ for schools sits oddly against grades elsewhere that read more like B and B+ across transport, connectivity, and safety — worth knowing if education quality is what's driving your move. Transport, by contrast, punches above its size: nine stops serving a population this small suggests decent bus coverage even without a rail station in the picture. Full-fibre broadband reaches most homes, which matters more than it used to for anyone working from that spare room.
Crime sits low in absolute terms — fourteen incidents logged in a year is a small number for any area — but nearly half of what does happen falls under violence and sexual offences, a category that's disproportionately large next to public order and anti-social behaviour further down the list. That's the kind of number that needs context: a low base means each incident swings the percentages more than it would in a bigger suburb, and the overall safety grade still comes out at B+. Green space is the other trade-off — there's very little of it recorded locally, so anyone used to a proper park on the doorstep will notice the gap. This suits people who've already decided they want settled, affordable, freehold housing with decent connectivity and are willing to look elsewhere for schools and open space rather than have both on the same street.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.