Town · 3,923 residents
Good · better than 3 in 10 towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Crowland scores 61/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
No topic reaches "very good" (70+); its best is safety (67).
It scores lowest on food & drink (38).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Crowland in East Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Crowland's streets are mostly detached houses on generous plots, the kind of place where a For Sale board reads "family home, own drive, no chain" rather than "investment opportunity." It's a village in the fullest sense — flat South Holland fenland around it, a population under 2,500, and a feel that owes more to Lincolnshire's wide skies than to any commuter-belt polish. The median age of just under 45 tells you this isn't a place full of twenty-somethings starting out; it's settled, a bit older than the national average, the sort of spot people move to rather than through.
The practical picture is mixed in an interesting way. There's one school in the immediate data — South View Community Primary, rated Good, with over 400 pupils, which is a solid, unglamorous option for families rather than a standout. Transport is thin: sixteen bus stops but no rail station appears in the local count, so this reads as a driving village, not a station-and-season-ticket one. Housing, meanwhile, is where Crowland's character sharpens: detached freehold homes dominate absolutely — twenty of the thirty-six recent sales — and freehold tenure runs at 35 out of 36. A median house price around £272,000 sits below the national £281,000 but comes in 22% higher than the wider South Holland district, so you're paying a premium for the village itself relative to its own patch, even while looking affordable next to the country as a whole.
Green space is real but modest — thirteen sites totalling just over 15 hectares, enough for a proper walk without being a destination in itself. There's no restaurant or named food venue in the picture here, which matches the overall grade pattern: this is a place graded A for housing and A overall, with safety also graded A, but schools and connectivity sit a notch down at B+, and nightlife lands at a plain B. That's the quiet spine of the story — a place that scores unusually well on housing stock and space, more ordinarily on the things that make a Saturday night out or a fast broadband upgrade easy. The crime figures back the safety grade up in outline — violence and sexual offences make the largest single share, as it does almost everywhere, but the volume (136 incidents across the year, in a village of this size) reads as low rather than alarming, and anti-social behaviour is a distant second.
This suits someone who wants a detached home with a drive, doesn't mind driving rather than training to work, and values quiet over choice — of restaurants, of schools, of nightlife. It won't suit anyone counting on a rail commute or a wide pick of Ofsted-rated schools nearby. The trade-off is a clear one: you're buying space, safety, and a settled community, and accepting that entertainment and transport options are limited on your own doorstep.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.