Village · 1,348 residents
Good · better than 3 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Cross in Hand scores 58/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (84).
It scores lowest on health (30) and food & drink (32).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Cross in Hand in South East, each measured against the national average.
Cross in Hand sits along the A267 with the kind of streetscape that gives itself away immediately: detached houses set back from the road, hedges rather than fences, and very little passing trade beyond what the village itself needs. It's not a place that performs for visitors. The houses do the talking, and what they say is that this is a settled, comfortably-off corner of the Weald rather than a commuter dormitory or a retirement postcard, even though at a median age of 50 it leans older than the national picture by a decade.
The property market backs this up in blunt terms. Detached homes dominate the sales here — the large majority of the 37 recent sales — nearly all freehold, and the median price of £515,000 puts Cross in Hand well above both the national typical price and the Wealden district average around it, some 41% higher than the wider district. A detached house here sells for £555,000 against a national detached median of £420,000, which tells you this isn't a place where you find a bargain family home; it's a place where you buy into space and settling in for the long term. Schooling fits that pattern of permanence rather than ambition-driven relocation: Cross-in-Hand Church of England Primary and Blackboys CofE Primary are both rated Good, solid neighbourhood schools rather than headline-grabbing ones, and the presence of independent options like Skippers Hill Manor Preparatory suggests some households look beyond the state sector entirely. There's no rail station in the data for the village itself, so this reads as a driving village — the nine local transport stops point to bus links rather than a train-based commute, which matters if you're weighing this against somewhere with a direct line to London.
Day-to-day life plays out on a small, human scale — six green spaces amounting to just under six hectares, modest but real, enough for a dog walk or a kickabout rather than a country park. What stands out most is the safety picture: an A grade against a backdrop where everything else — schools, transport, environment, housing — sits comfortably at or a little above the national average (B, B+, B+ across the board), rather than exceptional. Violence and sexual offences account for the largest single share of the 26 recorded crimes over the year, which sounds alarming until you register the numbers are small enough that a handful of incidents shift the percentages considerably; the overall trend is flat, not worsening. Full-fibre broadband reaches roughly two-thirds of the village, decent rather than universal, so remote workers should check street-level coverage rather than assume it.
This is a village for people who've already made their decision about pace of life — those trading commute convenience and nightlife for space, quiet, and a level of safety that's genuinely above average even by comfortable Wealden standards. It suits households with a car, a long-term view on property, and no urgent need for a train platform on the doorstep. Anyone who needs a fast rail commute or wants evening options beyond their own kitchen will find the village's quietness starts to feel like absence rather than calm.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.