Village · 322 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Civil parish boundary
Congham scores 47/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (81) and health (72).
It scores lowest on transport (31) and infrastructure (34).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Congham in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Congham reads as scattered farmhouses and converted barns rather than a village centre in the conventional sense — with fewer than 270 people spread across the parish and a population density a fraction of the regional average, this is a place where houses sit apart from each other, not on top of each other. The detached brick-and-flint properties that dominate here, all bought freehold, tell you this was never built for turnover; it was built for people who intend to stay.
That impression holds up under the numbers. The median age of 52.6 is well above both the regional and national norms, and the property mix — seven detached sales against just a handful of semis and terraces in the recent sample — points to a place that attracts people later in their working lives or into retirement, not young households starting out. Schooling is local and small-scale: Flitcham Church of England Primary Academy and Great Massingham CofE Primary School serve the immediate area, alongside Sandringham and West Newton Church of England Primary Academy, which carries a Good rating. There's no rail station in the picture here, and the connectivity and transport grades (a C apiece) confirm it — this is a driving village, not a commuting one, so anyone weighing it against a station-based life elsewhere should factor that in early.
Green space is modest in scale — just over two hectares across two named plots — which matters less than it sounds given how much open countryside surrounds the village anyway; the real weekend rhythm here is walking lanes and visiting the handful of villages nearby rather than a formal park circuit. There's no local restaurant or pub named in what I can see, which fits a place this size — you'll be driving to Great Massingham or into King's Lynn for an evening out. Health is graded solidly (a B), and full-fibre broadband reaches well over half of properties, so remote working is a realistic proposition even without a station.
On safety, Congham stands out: an A grade against a backdrop of only seven recorded crimes in the past year, and the trend is flat rather than worsening — genuinely rare for a place this size to feel this settled. The one crack in an otherwise calm picture is housing, graded C+, which shows up in price: the median sale of £400,000 sits comfortably above both the regional and national medians, and at 50.7% above the price level of the wider King's Lynn and West Newton district, this is a distinctly pricier corner of it. Affordability is graded B+ regardless, which tells you incomes here broadly keep pace with those higher costs. This suits people who've already banked some equity and want quiet, space, and a slower clock — not those chasing a station platform or a lively high street.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.