Village · 165 residents
Good · better than 4 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Civil parish boundary
Coatham Mundeville scores 60/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for affordability (87) and environment (83).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Coatham Mundeville in North East, each measured against the national average.
Coatham Mundeville is the kind of place where the houses do the talking - detached brick, decent plots, cars on the drive rather than the street. It's a small village, barely two hundred people, and the streetscape reflects that: quiet, low-density, more field than pavement. This isn't somewhere that attracts passing trade or nightlife; it attracts people who've already worked out what they want, which is space and quiet, and who are old enough and settled enough to have stopped needing much else. A median age pushing 54 tells you this is not a place full of first-time buyers or young families finding their feet - it's a place people move to once, and stay.
The property picture backs that up. Sales here skew terraced and semi-detached as much as detached, almost all freehold, and at a median around £220,000 that's actually below the regional median for Darlington - odd for a village this well-regarded, and worth knowing if you're expecting village prices to run ahead of the town. The affordability grade reflects that gap. Schooling is thin on the ground locally - Bishopton Redmarshall CofE Primary is the one sampled school nearby, an academy with under a hundred pupils, which suits the demographic already living here more than it signals a school-run village. Broadband is solid, with full fibre reaching most premises, so remote working is realistic even without much on the doorstep.
Green space is essentially one large asset - getting on for 26 hectares of it - rather than a scattering of small parks, which fits a village that's really one open landscape with houses dropped into it. There's no local restaurant scene to speak of in the data, and no rail station listed, so this is a driving village: you go elsewhere to eat, to shop, to catch a train. That won't suit everyone, but it's consistent with the whole picture - a place built around a quiet base rather than daily amenity. Healthcare and connectivity both sit at a respectable, unremarkable level - fine, not a selling point.
The one thing that needs saying plainly: the safety grade sits mid-table and is marked as worsening, and the crime rate here is dramatically higher than the Darlington average, driven almost entirely by anti-social behaviour and shoplifting - categories that often reflect a single problem spot or through-road rather than danger spread evenly across a village of two hundred people. It's the one number in an otherwise calm dataset that doesn't fit the picture, and it's worth asking a local resident about directly before you commit, rather than reading too much into the raw count. Everything else here - the environment grade, the housing grade, the affordability - points to a settled, comfortable village for people who've made their peace with needing a car and want their neighbours to be quiet. Whether that safety trend is a blip or a pattern is the real question to chase down before deciding.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.