Village · 518 residents
Good · better than 2 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Clun scores 57/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (85) and health (75).
It scores lowest on transport (31).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Clun in West Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Clun sits low in a valley of stone and timber-framed buildings, the kind of place where the castle ruins outdraw the shops and the high street runs out after a few hundred yards. It's a village that attracts people well past the school run years — the median age here is 60, a good two decades above the national figure — and everything about the pace of it, from the empty pavements to the quiet parish noticeboards, reflects that.
There's no station in the village itself; Knighton Rail Station is the nearest, which tells you this is a driving life, not a commuting one — if you're still working, it's likely from home or on your own terms rather than off a platform each morning. Schooling is thin but present: St George's CofE Academy serves the primary-age children who are here, a small school of just over a hundred pupils, alongside the tiny Newcastle CofE Primary down the road. There's no secondary provision in the village, which matters if you've got older children still at home, though given the age profile, most households have long since finished with all that. Housing leans heavily toward detached freehold property — every sale in the local sample was freehold, and six in ten were detached houses — which is the classic shape of a village where people buy once and stay. At a median of £387,500, prices run noticeably above both the Shropshire and national medians, roughly 44% above the county figure, putting Clun among the pricier corners of a county that isn't cheap to begin with.
Green space is generous relative to the population — seven separate patches for a tiny resident count — so the walking and the wildlife are more the draw than any restaurant scene, which barely registers here. The rhythm of life is castle grounds, riverside paths, and the Shropshire hills rather than a choice of places to eat; if that's what you want from a Saturday, it delivers, but it isn't a place for browsing. Healthcare and general wellbeing indicators come back strong — the area's health grade is among the best you'll see — and safety follows the same pattern, graded top-tier with crime running flat year on year. The one crime figure worth a second look is violence and sexual offences, at 40% of a very small overall count; with numbers this low, a handful of incidents swings the percentage sharply, so it reads more as statistical noise than a pattern to worry about, especially set against a headline safety grade that's otherwise excellent. Broadband is solid too, with fibre reaching most properties, which matters more than it once did for anyone working remotely or simply keeping in touch.
This is a place that suits people who've already done the commuting and the school gates, who want a freehold house with land around it and don't mind driving for groceries or a night out. It would suit less well anyone needing a nearby secondary school or a station on the doorstep — those trade-offs are real and worth sitting with before you commit to a postcode this quiet.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.