Town · 9,604 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official settlement boundary (National Records of Scotland)
Clarkston scores 71/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (89).
It scores lowest on transport (31) and food & drink (32).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Clarkston in Scotland, each measured against the national average.
Clarkston reads as solid granite semis and neat front gardens, the kind of place where the cars in the driveways are a few years old but well looked after and nobody's in a hurry. It sits south of Glasgow with the settled, slightly formal air of a suburb that has never had to try hard to convince anyone of its worth.
The numbers back up what you'd sense on the ground: this is one of the least deprived pockets in Scotland, ranked at the very top of the national deprivation scale on both income and general circumstances, and a median house price a little over £283,000 puts it comfortably above the going rate in the wider region without tipping into anything showy. Council tax here undercuts the national Band D average slightly, which is a small mercy given everything else about the area signals comfort rather than economy. Prices have been drifting upward gently over the past year, and the broader trend is described as improving — nothing dramatic, just steady appreciation of the kind that suits people who plan to stay rather than flip.
The population skews older-middle, with a median age approaching 45, well above both the Scottish and regional averages, and the density — over 4,000 people per square kilometre against a national figure closer to 2,000 — tells you this is tightly packed suburban living rather than anything semi-rural, despite the leafy impression. That combination points to a place of established households: people who bought here a while ago, or moved in for the schools and stayed once the children left home. Full-fibre broadband reaches the vast majority of properties, which matters more than it once did now that hybrid working is normal.
Green space is modest rather than abundant — a handful of parks totalling a little over five hectares — enough for a dog walk or a Saturday kickabout but not the sprawling estate grounds you'd find further out. Health outcomes here are excellent, among the strongest ratings in the dataset, and personal safety scores just as high, which makes the one discordant note worth naming plainly: the safety trend is marked as worsening. It's not a place that reads as troubled — the underlying grade remains top-tier — but it's the one line moving the wrong direction in an otherwise settled picture, and worth a conversation with anyone who already lives on the street rather than a footnote you skip past.
Nightlife and evening buzz are the trade-off for all this steadiness — the grade there is middling, and Clarkston was never built to entertain you past nine o'clock. What it offers instead is the quieter architecture of a good suburb: proximity to reasonable schooling, a housing stock that holds its value, and a community old enough to have settled into its own rhythms. It suits people who've made peace with early nights and Sunday papers over late bars and constant reinvention — professionals with families, older couples downsizing from bigger properties nearby, anyone who wants Glasgow within reach but not on the doorstep. If what you want is edge or spontaneity, look elsewhere; if you want a place that quietly works, this is a strong candidate.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.