Town · 8,855 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Part of an official built-up area
City of London scores 51/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for food & drink (99) and schools (92).
It scores lowest on safety (8) and environment (28).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for City of London in London, each measured against the national average.
Glass towers stand over medieval alleyways here, and by six in the evening half the streets empty out — this is a place built for offices and livery halls first, homes a distant second. You notice it in the quiet of a Sunday-blank square mile and the surprising density of wine bars tucked under railway arches, catering to a workday population that dwarfs the number who actually sleep here.
The practical picture is a study in contrasts you have to hold together at once. Transport is about as good as England gets — Moorgate Station alone bundles rail and underground lines, and with seventeen rail connections in the area, commuting anywhere in London is barely a decision you need to make. Schools follow the same pattern: City of London Primary Academy in Islington carries an Outstanding rating, and the area's schools average close to the top Ofsted band, though what actually dominates the roll call are independent names like City of London School and City of London School for Girls, which tells you something about who sends children to school from here — professionals who can afford fees, not a cross-section of families relying on the state system. At a median age of 37, this is not a retirement postcode or a nursery-run either; it is working-age London, skewed toward people whose lives revolve around the office more than the school gate.
Housing here means a flat, overwhelmingly leasehold, and that shapes what a "For Sale" board actually promises: eight in ten sales in the area are leasehold flats, freehold is a rarity, and the typical flat trades well above the national median for its type. Against the wider City of London borough, prices sit a touch below the parent average, which is a reminder that "cheaper than the postcode's own borough" still means a median approaching three-quarters of a million pounds — this remains one of the priciest corners of the country, sitting near the very top of the national price scale even as the last year's figures have softened. Green space is not the draw — with under three hectares of the standard parkland allowance in easy reach, this is not somewhere you come for a garden. Eating out leans toward the expense-account end, plenty of choice but pitched at people spending someone else's per diem as often as their own.
The one grade that jars against all this polish is safety, marked down and trending in the wrong direction, and the crime figures explain why: theft, shoplifting and violence dominate the count, a pattern typical of a dense commercial centre with heavy footfall rather than a residential neighbourhood problem — the crime rate here runs meaningfully above the borough's own average, which for a borough already accustomed to City-centre policing is a notable gap. This suits people whose life is genuinely built around being in the Square Mile — bankers, lawyers, musicians at the Guildhall School, anyone who wants a five-minute commute and doesn't mind a hushed, transient street scene once the offices close. It suits less well anyone hoping for a conventional residential community, a garden, or a quiet sense of safety after dark.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.