Village · 1,840 residents
Good · better than 6 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Chipperfield scores 65/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (81).
It scores lowest on health (30).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Chipperfield in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Chipperfield announces itself in brick and hedgerow: detached houses set back from lanes, a common at the centre of things, and very little passing traffic that isn't headed somewhere specific. This is not a place you stumble into on a shortcut between towns — it's a destination in its own right for people who've already decided they want the space and quiet that a village green buys you, and who can afford what that costs.
That cost is the first thing to sit with. The median sale price here comes in at £540,000, and detached houses — which dominate the market alongside a near-total freehold tenure — are trading at more than double the national detached average, comfortably outpacing even Dacorum as a whole by around 23%. Nineteen sales is a small sample, so treat the specific figures as a temperature rather than a thermometer reading, but the direction is unambiguous: this sits toward the top end of the national spread. Schooling is a single-institution affair in the immediate village — St Paul's Church of England Primary — with Sarratt's Church of England primary and the independent York House School in easy reach for those casting a slightly wider net; none carry a published Ofsted rating in this data, so judge them on reputation and a visit rather than a headline grade. With a median age of 49 and a population barely over 650, this reads less like a first-rung commuter suburb and more like a place people move to once they've already built the career and the family, and now want the garden and the good school run to go with it.
Green space is generous relative to the size of the place — seven separate spaces across a village this small — and the crime pattern, while headlined by violence and sexual offences as the largest single category, sits against an overall safety grade that's among the strongest you'll see, with the trend holding flat rather than sliding either way. Connectivity is solid without being flashy: full-fibre broadband reaches most homes, and with seventeen local transport stops but no rail station registering in the immediate data, this leans on the car and bus more than the train — worth checking directly if a fast line into London is non-negotiable for you. The overall grade profile is consistently strong — safety and environment both rate highly, nightlife surprisingly so for a village this size, schools and connectivity solidly average-plus — with nothing in the pattern that reads as a warning sign so much as a place that has quietly got most things right.
Who fits here is fairly self-selecting: households well past the first-time-buyer stage, drawn by acreage, quiet, and a sense of having arrived rather than being on the way somewhere else. The trade-off is equally plain — you're paying a serious premium for that quiet, and you'll need to build your own answer to the commute and school-choice questions rather than relying on the village to hand you a single obvious option. If that exchange feels fair, this is a place to settle into rather than pass through.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.