Village · 862 residents
Good · better than 4 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Chawley scores 61/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (91).
It scores lowest on health (23) and food & drink (30).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Chawley in South East, each measured against the national average.
Chawley reads as detached houses on quiet plots, the kind of place where a For Sale board rarely goes up and, when it does, it's gone before the paint dries. Fourteen sales is the whole recent record, and ten of those were detached homes bought outright — freehold, no chains of flats or new-build estates, just settled family houses that tend to change hands within families rather than on the open market.
That scarcity shows up in the price. The median sale sits at £613,875, comfortably above both the Vale of White Horse district figure and the regional average for detached stock, and it puts Chawley in the top few percent nationally on price alone. This is a place income decile 10 and deprivation decile 10 describe accurately: about as well-off, on paper, as anywhere gets. Council tax band D costs a touch less than the national median, which is a small mercy given what you're paying to get in. The one named school in the picture, Cumnor Church of England School, serves the area as a primary option, though no inspection grade is listed here to comment on. With a median age of 46.5 — well above the national 40.4 — this reads less as a starter-home village and more as a place people move to once and stay.
Green space is where the numbers ask a genuine question: 0.04 hectares logged against the whole population is a fraction of the regional norm, which will surprise anyone picturing a typical Home Counties village green. It suggests Chawley's setting relies more on the wider countryside around it than on any formal park within its own boundary — worth checking on the ground rather than taking the figure as the whole truth. Full-fibre broadband reaches about two-thirds of properties, a reasonable position for a small settlement, and seven transport stops keep it connected without this being a commuter-hub village built around a station.
The one place the story turns is safety. Overall grade A, safety grade A+, and yet the twelve-month crime count — small in absolute terms, five incidents by one count, fifteen by the fuller breakdown — is dominated by violence and sexual offences at almost 40% of all recorded crime, with anti-social behaviour and theft making up most of the rest. Trend is flat, not worsening, and with numbers this low a single incident swings the percentages hard, so it's more a flag to note than a pattern to fear. It sits oddly against a grade profile that's otherwise a run of As and B-pluses across affordability, housing, connectivity, and transport, and that oddness is worth sitting with rather than dismissing.
Put together, this is a settled, moneyed, low-density corner of the South East that suits people who've already done their house-hunting elsewhere and are buying into stability rather than convenience — no bustling parade of restaurants or nightlife here (the C+ nightlife grade tells you that plainly), just space, quiet, and a price tag that reflects both.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.