Village · 3,589 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Chartham scores 51/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
No topic reaches "very good" (70+); its best is transport (68).
It scores lowest on health (39).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Chartham in South East, each measured against the national average.
Terraced cottages and low brick rows dominate the streets here, the kind of village fabric that hasn't been much troubled by new building — there's no new-build to speak of, and the housing stock reads as settled rather than speculative. It's a small place, just over five hundred people, with a median age nudging 39, which tells you this isn't a village full of first-time buyers or students; it's a place people move to and stay in.
The practical picture is straightforward: Chartham Rail Station puts you on the line without needing a car for the commute, and the village's transport grade is among the strongest scores in this profile, which for a settlement this size is unusual and worth noting. Schooling is thinner — Chartham Primary School is the only school in the village, an academy converter with a few hundred pupils, so families here are typically drawing on Canterbury's wider secondary options rather than everything being on the doorstep. Housing itself is terraced and freehold in character — the large majority of sales are freehold — and at a median around £305,000 it sits a little below the wider Canterbury district figure, making it one of the more affordable pockets of this part of Kent, though still above the national median.
Green space is modest rather than generous — eleven pockets amounting to a few hectares, enough for a walk but not for wide open country — and there's no standout restaurant scene recorded here, so day-to-day life leans on Canterbury itself for eating out and bigger errands, with the village functioning as the quieter place you come home to. Health provision reads well locally, and the overall grade pattern is solidly respectable — B+ across health, housing and the general score, an A for both transport and nightlife despite the size of the place. The one grade that sits apart is schools, marked down not for quality but for choice, and safety, which sits mid-table with violence and anti-social behaviour as the largest single categories, at a level the data marks as flat rather than worsening or improving — no story of decline, just a number to sit with rather than dwell on.
This is a village that suits someone who wants a settled, rail-connected base with Canterbury's schools and shops within reach rather than on the doorstep, who doesn't need a restaurant strip on their own street, and who's comfortable with a smaller, older housing stock rather than new-build gloss. It's not a place that will surprise you either way — steady is the operative word.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.