Village · 323 residents
Good · better than 4 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Civil parish boundary
Charlton Musgrove scores 61/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (80) and affordability (72).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Charlton Musgrove in South West, each measured against the national average.
Charlton Musgrove reads as a scatter of stone and render houses along quiet lanes, with the kind of detached properties that come with paddocks rather than parking permits — there's no high street to speak of, and that's rather the point.
The property market here tells you most of what you need to know before you've even seen a for sale board: this is a village of detached freehold homes, ten of the last ten sales were freehold, and the median price of £652,500 sits well above both the Somerset and national pictures — around a third higher than the wider county. Detached houses locally are fetching £705,000 against a national detached median of £420,000, which puts Charlton Musgrove firmly in the top slice of the market nationally. Somerset itself isn't a cheap county, but this village is pricier again, and the income figures back that up — households here sit in the top income decile, even though the broader deprivation ranking is more middling, mid-table nationally rather than exceptional. That gap between income and deprivation decile is worth sitting with; it suggests a place of comfortable individual households rather than one that scores well on every civic measure.
There's no rail station or school named in the local picture here, and with a median age around 52 against a national 40, this reads less as a commuter-belt village for young families and more as a settled, older population who have likely put down roots rather than arrived recently for a school catchment. Full-fibre broadband reaches over seven in ten properties, which matters more than usual in a village this size — remote working or running a business from home looks entirely plausible. Six transport stops serve a population of under 500, so a car remains close to essential.
Green space is generous relative to the population — three sites covering 27 hectares for 456 residents is a markedly higher ratio than the regional or national average, so paddocks, footpaths and open ground are the backdrop to daily life rather than a rare treat. There's no restaurant or pub named in what's on record, so eating out likely means driving to a neighbouring village or town rather than stepping outside. The one note that runs against the otherwise comfortable grain is safety: crime is trending in the wrong direction, and the local rate sits noticeably above the Somerset average, with violence and sexual offences and burglary the two largest single categories. The absolute numbers are small — this is a village of a few hundred people, not a town — but it's the one grade that doesn't match the rest of the pattern, and it's worth asking a neighbour or two about before you commit.
This suits someone who wants space, quiet, and a freehold home with land, who doesn't need a station platform or a school run on the doorstep, and who's comfortable driving for most day-to-day needs. It would suit less well anyone wanting late-night life, walkable amenities, or the reassurance of a crime trend heading the right way.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.