Suburb · 235 residents
Fair · better than 2 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Causeway Green scores 52/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
No topic reaches "very good" (70+); its best is infrastructure (68).
It scores lowest on food & drink (19) and health (34).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Causeway Green in West Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Causeway Green is the kind of place you'd drive through without quite registering it — a tight grid of semi-detached houses off the main road, more front gardens than shopfronts, nothing that announces itself. It's small too, just a couple of hundred people counted in the local figures, packed in at a density well above the national average, which tells you this is a compact residential pocket rather than a place with its own centre of gravity.
The housing picture is straightforward: this is freehold semi-detached territory, almost entirely so, with terraces making up the rest and no new-build in the mix at all. A median sale price around £250,000 sits below both the regional and national medians, and roughly a fifth cheaper than the typical price across England, though it's still running ahead of the borough figure for Sandwell as a whole. That's the trade-off in one line — cheaper than the national picture, pricier than its own council area, and on modest streets that have been lived-in a while rather than freshly built. Council tax at Band D comes in a touch below both the regional and national averages, which helps the monthly arithmetic.
The grades here paint a fairly consistent picture — solid on affordability, connectivity and the environment, respectable on housing and schools, but transport and nightlife lag behind, and there's no rail station or notable green space named in the local data beyond one modest patch of just over five and a half hectares. That absence of transport infrastructure matters if you're commuting: this reads as a drive-first suburb rather than a rail-commuter one. Schools average out in the "good" territory nationally, which is a reasonable if unremarkable starting point for a family.
The one figure that breaks the pattern, and the one worth sitting with, is crime. The overall safety grade sits at a respectable B+, but the underlying rate is running more than four times higher than the Sandwell average, with violence and sexual offences alone accounting for roughly half of all recorded incidents — a proportion notably higher than the vehicle crime and theft that follow it. That's a stark local-versus-parent contrast, and it's the detail that most changes how the rest of this profile should be read: a cheap, well-connected-to-broadband, decently-graded suburb that nonetheless sits inside a borough with a markedly elevated crime rate. Anyone weighing this one should look at that figure directly rather than let the tidier grades around it soften it.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.