Suburb · 8,285 residents
Fair · better than 2 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Cauldwell scores 53/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for schools (80) and health (80).
It scores lowest on safety (20).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Cauldwell in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Terraces and flats dominate the streets here, dense and close-packed, with a turnover of shops that suggests a population always slightly on the move rather than settled in for decades. At just over 5,400 people per square kilometre against a national average nearer 2,600, Cauldwell feels more urban than its "suburb" label suggests — this is inner-Bedford living, not the edge-of-town estate you might picture.
Housing is where the arithmetic gets interesting: a median price of £225,000 sits some 28% below the Bedford borough figure and well under the national median too, and freehold terraces make up the bulk of what sells, alongside a substantial flat market. That combination — cheap by regional standards, freehold-dominant, mostly Victorian-terrace in character — reads as a place where first-time buyers and young movers get a foothold rather than where money retires. The five-year direction on price is improving, and rents at £1,169 sit close to the national figure despite the discounted sale prices, which tells you demand for renting here holds up even where buying is cheap. For schools, the picture is genuinely strong: Bedford Free School carries an Outstanding rating with a progress 8 score of 1.11, and the area's school grade overall is among the best you'll find — a real asset if you've got children of secondary age.
The safety picture is the one figure that cuts against everything else. Crime here runs at nearly six times the Bedford borough rate, dominated by violence and sexual offences, with anti-social behaviour and shoplifting close behind — a pattern more typical of a dense town centre than a residential suburb, and it's the one grade (a D+) sitting well below the A-and-B pattern elsewhere on the scorecard. It hasn't been getting worse — the trend is flat — but it also hasn't been improving, so this is a steady-state fact about the area rather than a blip. Green space is thin on the ground too, just under seven hectares spread across twenty small plots, nothing like the borough or national average per head, so this isn't an area that rewards you with parkland for the trade-off.
What you get, in sum, is a compact, well-connected inner-Bedford pocket — Bedford St Johns and Bedford mainline stations both within reach, decent full-fibre coverage, strong schools — sold at a genuine discount to the wider area, with the safety data as the one number you can't wish away. It suits someone who wants city-adjacent convenience and affordable freehold ownership and is prepared to make peace with a crime rate that sits well above its neighbours; it likely won't suit someone whose priority is green space or a quiet, low-crime retreat.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.