Village · 616 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Cassington scores 75/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (87).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Cassington in South East, each measured against the national average.
Stone cottages, a handful of farmhouses converted into detached family homes, and a village green that hasn't needed much more than a church and a primary school for as long as anyone can remember — that's Cassington in a glance. It's small enough that you notice a new car on the street, and the kind of place where the population rounds to under a hundred, not because it's dying but because it was never built to be bigger.
The housing stock tells you most of what you need to know about who ends up here: detached houses on freehold titles dominate the handful of sales each year, with a median price around £420,000 — a touch below the West Oxfordshire average despite sitting comfortably among the better-off villages nationally (this is a top-decile spot for both income and general deprivation terms, which locals feel more as "quiet money" than visible wealth). There's no new-build estate pulling in young commuter families here; this is a village of people staying put, reflected in a median age pushing 48 and a tiny, slow-turning property market — just seven sales recorded recently, turning over at less than half the national rate. The one school, St Peter's Church of England Primary, is the anchor for any family that is here, an academy with under a hundred pupils rather than a big feeder school — fine if you want your child to know everyone in their class, less so if you want league-table choice. Oxford's commuter routes are within reach by road rather than rail directly from the village, and that absence of a local station is itself the tell: this is a drive-to-the-platform sort of place, not a walk-to-the-train one.
Green space is modest in absolute terms — a handful of small patches rather than a sprawling park — but with under a hundred residents sharing it, nobody's fighting for a bench. There's no real restaurant scene to speak of inside the village itself; a pub lunch or a trip into Oxford or Witney covers most weekends. What stands out instead is the safety profile: Cassington posts one of the lowest crime grades you'll see, essentially flat year on year, and even the handful of incidents on record (around four in the past year) tilt disproportionately towards a single serious category rather than the petty, repeated stuff — worth knowing, but not alarming at this scale. Broadband is a genuine strength, with full-fibre coverage over 80%, better than you'd expect for a village this size, so remote work is entirely workable.
This is a place for people who've already decided they want quiet over convenience — a long-settled, financially comfortable, low-crime village where the trade-off is distance from shops, restaurants, and rail, not safety or space. It will suit someone trading commute time for a drive and a sense of calm; it won't suit someone who wants nightlife, school choice, or a station at the end of the road.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.